what extent can philosophy be considered in science?

Answer 1

They are in some ways integral.

Science is, in effect, a philosophical approach to knowledge, learning and discovery. It does not sit in a vaccum. One of the first people to formaly recognise this was Descartes with his Discourse on the Method. This begins in effect with the question "how can we know anything", given that we cannot even rely on our observations (they could all be illusions and we cannot readily prove otherwise) - hence his famous line "I think, therefore I am" as the start of a line of deductive thinking from self awareness to objective scientific method,

Answer 2

They the two contain the systematic seek for actuality and inspire a rigorous form of thinking with regard to the international. and that they share a basic foundation; fairly of having philosophers and scientists, we used to have as a rule "philosophers" who have been a mix of the two (like, say, Aritstotle). yet philosophy and technology at present are patently separate disciplines. technology is in line with actual experimentation; if there is not any longer an test in contact, then what you have possibly isn't technology. there is a few gray section approximately issues like astronomy, and different fields the place rigorous varieties of assertion are used fairly of experimentation, yet for the main area, technology is a discipline defined by utilising the potential of inductively reasoning from experimental documents. Philosophy isn't. in case you throw arithmetic into the lot, this will become nonetheless extra complicated. various significant math has been performed by utilising philosophers; seem at Leibniz, working example. in the final century, philosophers (like Wittgenstein) in fact created formal logic as we now be responsive to it. Bertrand Russel labored on set concept. it is going to be referred to, besides, that arithmetic isn't an experimental discipline (aside from the certainly magnificent case of info by utilising exhaustion). Linguistics, too, has significant overlap with some varieties of analytic philosophy. and likewise to arithmetic -- computational linguistics is an thrilling (if arbitrary and confounding) field. Psychology and philosophy have additionally traditionally overlapped -- Freud, Jung, and Lacan, all psychologists, are plenty extra significant to extreme theorists than they are to psychologists. With the introduction of behavioral psychology, that's a extra explicitly scientifically discipline, psychology and philosophy are drifting aside returned. At any fee, i've got long previous on long adequate. Suffice it to assert that philosophy is an particularly extensive field which informs and is counseled by utilising any form of alternative fields. as quickly as we can't or don't have inductively-derived documents in any field, philosophy is from time to time what fills the hollow. Are the strategies and the strategies the comparable ingredient? Ask a logician, no longer a neuroscientist, because of the fact there is not any test which could inform you the respond. All we are in a position to do is think of very of course and rationally with regard to the question -- and that's what philosophers are there for. this is not any longer technology, yet that does no longer advise this is not any longer functional.

Answer 3

They are separate and in fact when they were mixed, science got drastically screwed up. The Greek philosophers said that earth was the center of the universe and it too almost 2 centuries to get that rubbish overturned.

Answer 4

To no extent. It just goes round robin to me, which makes we wonder what the point of it all is.