2007-02-25 21:33:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
i dont think its a hoax either,i never did.but theres indiputable evidence that the photos were altered.(stars added,shadows cast,frames moved)
2007-02-25 21:38:03 · update #1
think whatever u like..
because no one can force u to think by his view..
they can only put up their opinion in front of u..
its upto u what u want to believe..
2007-02-26 03:09:28 · answer #1 · answered by uv 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I don't know where you got this documentation of photographs being altered, but if anything is a hoax, that would be it. Is it just a coincidence that the people disputing the moon landing live in trailers and collect aluminum cans for a living?
2007-02-26 01:40:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stars added? I thought it was the lack of stars that made them "fake"!
As for the shadows and other things, there is a matter of perspective, but then the hoax belivers want you to forget that.
No, there is no hoax, man went to the moon.
2007-02-25 22:40:51 · answer #3 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it was not a hoax. If it was, the Soviets would have said something. Anyway, all of that "proof" that it was faked is not based on anything solid. Stars cannot appear in snapshots, for one thing. They really did land on the Moon.
2007-02-25 23:53:51 · answer #4 · answered by bldudas 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are free to believe whatever you want. If you want to believe that some evidence is indisputable, whatever that might mean, and therefore that this is a hoax, go ahead. Have you seen this indisputable evidence first hand? I doubt it. If not, then it is not indisputable. Also, it is not possible to prove a negative, and therefore such evidence cannot exist, unless your evidence is evidence of lying by nasa.
2007-02-26 01:37:20 · answer #5 · answered by Fred 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What evidence? Give us a link.
In all the photos I've seen, there were no stars visible. The astronauts were in direct sunlight; it was too bright for stars to show up on film.
2007-02-25 22:37:14 · answer #6 · answered by eagedeon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So who's got this indisputable evidence and what makes them so trustworthy. We sometimes seem to believe anyone that says they are an expert. Self proclamation & a degree don't make anyone above reproach. I don't buy it.
2007-02-25 21:43:09 · answer #7 · answered by irmaynerds 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but the past two presidential elections were.
2007-02-25 21:36:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, people are just conspiracy nuts.
2007-02-25 21:35:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no lol
2007-02-25 21:35:08 · answer #10 · answered by sarah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋