The Hamilton-Backer report call.
2007-02-25 20:33:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is no peaceful resolutions in Iraq if there is no peace in the holy land. Its hard to understand but its true read Carter new book.
2007-02-25 20:49:03 · update #1
Peace will be achieved if all countries in the Middle East agree on the existence of Israel and the latter to give the land to the Palestinians they are supposed to occupy.
2007-02-25 20:37:30 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No,i don't believe there can ever be peace in the middle east, as long as the people there are alive. Sending in ground troops was a waste of valuable lives,but if the western allies had agreed to just flatten the whole place, after the dust settled only then would there be peace. The PC morons that make these decisions don't live in the real world!
2007-02-26 05:07:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, it would be nice if they stopped fighting. But, I mean, they've been fighting practically since the Crusades. You can't just stop that with a peace treaty. And we should probably work getting the country we're occupying to get to peace first before we move on to others.
2007-02-26 05:06:53 · answer #3 · answered by justagirl 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Screw the book. Look at history. There will be no peace as long as there is a Holy Land.
2007-02-26 04:53:19 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Nobody 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes it might... if it were truly an all-out peace conference where all the concerned nations attended.
2007-02-26 23:48:13 · answer #5 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But the Israeli lobby will be out of business if there is any peace.
http://www.nowarforisrael.com/
2007-02-26 10:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by DAVAY 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO
2007-02-26 04:36:38 · answer #7 · answered by Pro Bush 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋