Does anyone else agree that it was a very good match? Both teams played well, but the team with the most grit, did win.
BLUE IS THE COLOUR!!!!
2007-02-25 20:21:03 · 10 answers · asked by vixenite 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
was a very good game. arsenal youngsters played really good. i am proud of them. losing 2 chelsea is what they needed. its all part of a learning curb. the fight afta was silly but thats inexperience 4 u. i mean obi mikel is young he got sent of. it cud av gone ne way last night.
2007-02-25 21:24:10 · answer #1 · answered by mr_fewer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If anyone heard the match reports they would think that there was only one time on the pitch .Yes that time from north London played well and of course they're going to play well .It's a final and they want a first time place.But we (the chels)played well too .It's ok having pace but i'd rather have what we have and that is pace , power and JT what else do es a time need.Come on the blues
2007-02-26 06:18:17 · answer #2 · answered by llamedos 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's all very well playing pretty football, but goals decide matches. Always have. Always will.
And the behaviour of the Arsenal players could hardly be described as 'pretty'!
And is Mikel the first player ever to get a straight red for shirt-pulling?!!!!!!
2007-02-26 04:34:31 · answer #3 · answered by Quickthinking 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
For an hour we played you off the park with our football pretty? don't you mean fluid, something your crap team will never be capable of. Probably why your team's not so popular, at least Man u and Arsenal play attractive football, when you seem to scrap by the skin of your teeth with just hoofing the ball and hoping for deflections. your get your arses kicked when you come to us in May with your little rent boy in tow. Btw our whole starting squad cost less then your useless Shevchenko cost. Buys wisely your manager does don't he?
2007-02-26 15:36:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good Game spoilt by abysmal Footballers behaving like spoilt children, If asked I think blame should be firmly on each team, with the captain`s being punished for not controlling their team.
2007-02-26 04:48:00 · answer #5 · answered by madge 51 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is high time u started thinkin about the fun and entertainment in football. the final is all about the young gunner vs money. arsenal really played a good game and they lost out of symparty good game up gunner.
2007-02-26 05:53:20 · answer #6 · answered by banji smith a 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was an Ok game, glad to see the blues take it although I am not a fan of theirs. I think the manager adds a bit of colour to the game in a good way and they have some good English players, it would be good to see Joe Cole back again also
2007-02-26 04:30:52 · answer #7 · answered by philipscottbrooks 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It will win us games in the future. Chelsea put out the best they had.
2007-02-26 08:01:48 · answer #8 · answered by alan r. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the match wasn't as good but the gunners need appreciation for their hard fight.walcott was superb!
2007-02-26 07:12:41 · answer #9 · answered by katutush 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree....for one reason.....if you spend 10 minutes in yr build up play you give the opposition too much time to get back and get organised......they have to use their pace more to stretch the opposition and get them opened ......i would use their two quicks.....Henry , Walcott , and one other to achieve this....
2007-02-26 05:54:48 · answer #10 · answered by scottish football ....nuff said 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋