If the Knicks could only keep one player who should it be?

Answer 1

David Lee no doubt. He's a walking double double, he's young, and has a great upside

Answer 2

I love marbury and nate robinson so i think those are two good players it is really close to decide though. Out of all the players on the Knicks they each play a major role in the game even though they're not to good each player is important in there own little way to help the team in any way they can. Tough question because each player is the one player the Knicks need. Hope that makes sense. : D

Answer 3

First of all, the Knicks need to keep a lot of the current players. To not keep them would be to destroy a great team before that team even reached the glory that it will reach. Because this is a very young team that's just starting to come up. They are coalescing, so they can't be ripped apart. To answer the question though, I say Eddy Curry, because he is our franchise player.

Answer 4

David Lee. The guy has been solid all year. He is the only consistent player that they have.

Answer 5

Nate Robinson

Answer 6

Quetin Richardson

His performance is so well when he played in the Suns. However, he is now suck in Knicks.

I still trust his ability to get a good performance.

Answer 7

David Lee. He would become more like Tim Duncan throughout his Career

Answer 8

Channing Frye

Answer 9

Eddie Curry is there only consistent player this season.

Answer 10

eddy curry. true, he doesn't defend or rebound great. but he's big, strong, a high-percentage shooter, and a dominant low-post scorer, and those are things that give a team in the east a huge advantage, because there aren't many top big men in the east.