Do u think that we should abolish the multiparty system from indian politics?

Question

We the citizens of india has observed it that due to the multyparty system in our politics,we are losing so mush in present scenario.in our constitution there is a multyparty system ,but don't u think that this has contributed a lot in wasting lots of money,manpower as well as our valuable time which we could ahve utilised for our progress.i agree that we all should get the chance to put our views forward,b'coz we had the right to do so,
But i think this kind of system has made our politics a safe stage for the buy-sale poratl ol mla for support a govt,certain policies,some values.i belive that now it's the time that our supreme court should think about setting a norm for eithr 2 or 3 PARTY system,so taht we can get quick reforms.b'coz a nation doesn't need a mob to solve his problems ,it's only need dedicated mind & people who r willing to serve it.
so give ur support or ur point against it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

hmmm.. A very difficult Question to answer
In India we have multi-party system so we can make out many drawbacks out of it as we watch it regularly.which any lay man can make out even if he is educated or not.We need to think wether the two party system is adoptable in India or not...

Now I would like to give my opinion on this wether Two party system is feasible or not.I think it is not as good as the multi party system.as the politics in India is in its worst phase and if its two party system then the leaders think if we r not coming then the other party will come and the don't even think about development as they can have understanding with other party people as that is easier than looking into the welfare of the people.

If its multi party then the people have little bit of confidence that they can Vote for other party else they can also participate but if its two party system then the parties decide who to participate and who are not to....In a two party system politics purely become a buisness place.which can be stopped in multi party system.


But I agree there are many loopholes in our constitution which are to be closed for a better India and a better base for our future....which can be done when we get honest and dedicated politicians which is not possible in near future....;)

Answer 2

That requires a whole sale reformation of the electoral system. Do you know that our Constitution does not recognise the party system? It is only through the Election Commission, the political parties can be governed. The Commission only registers the political parties, on the basis of the vote share in the election. Personally, it is difficult to abolish the multiparty system, in India, where a number of States with various multi lingual and ethnic identities.

Answer 3

there are incredibly some issues in existence which will not be able to be made understood to others. Marriage and married existence do not matter purely on 2 persons - a female and a boy, yet additionally the social help, i.e., mum and dad, neighbours, government government, or maybe the way forward for toddlers. as long as marriage is for the production of next technology, one prefer one and all of those. In admire of a female, her destiny could be dealt with mum and dad as long as mum and dad are alive. it is the organic affection and tendency. There are innumerable hurdles in married existence, that could not be confronted one or 2 persons on my own, which soever the international. After courting is predicated on the matching of evaluations in each and every concerns related to existence. whether one claims that the span of existence can not be predicted. expectancies are save us alive, and except expectancies are in suggestions, existence is a nil - "for whom, for what, why one (first individual) could stay" is the question leads one to stay or suicide. In Indian astrology, there's a concept to be sure the matching of sixteen factors and so some distance people who tournament one and all of those sixteen (however uncommon) have lead the main effective existence (with out searching for acceptance). An single individual can by no skill comprehend the clever ingredient of married existence. The enjoyments of married existence would long purely for one or 2 years and then the clever existence comes. Thereafter the getting older and whilst replace into previous, having no assets, no earnings, and a point of ravenous comes, then anybody would look returned and the two curse the disobedience of mum and dad or own follies that bring about this variety of point. Of-direction, there's a explanation for good and undesirable good fortune, which continues to be unknown to every person. as long as a loving and affectionate mum and dad are there, enable them to % such remember, (if not compliment the Lord).

Answer 4

In a country of diverse cultures and geographical difference, Multi-party system should exist.

But what i feel is there should be a criteria for entry into politics. Only those people who are genuinely interested in the upliftment of their country and not their individual treasure, should be given the chance to enter politics.

All politician should have served in the defence for a minimum period of 1 year which will make them more methodical, highly focussed and patriotic in nature.

Now no politicians with a pinch of feelings for the country does exist. Anyone who enter politics feel that it the best place to give a try

Answer 5

This seems to be a good idea preeti, but i'm of the opinion since we live in a democratic setup, so it might be difficult to do it. May be another solution is possible that we consider majority on basis of the number of seats in the house and one who reaches that figure makes the govt. If we do a small alteration to it by not taking a fixed figure for majority, but instead invite the party with the highest votes to form the government, then it will lead to a single party govt, which will be more stable and also it will save lots of public money by avoiding by-elections.

Answer 6

what would you prefer over multi parties?? Dictatorship???? You may see problems with your system, but much better than other forms of government.
Start to work on improvement of the system, the people can make changes..

Answer 7

Yes. We should abolish multiparty System and only 2 party system should be adopted. Necessary Constitutional amendment may be made to this effect.
This will be possible if people are called for voting on this issue

Answer 8

The multi-party system is not suited for India because the people are confused to support a party because of the many choices unlike in a two-party system like in the United States where politicians stand only for two basic issues being bannered by their parties.

Answer 9

no i don think that could anyway ensure that wht ever govt. will do is good. it would rather monopolise the politics where only 2 or 3 parties will be the players in the arena. whereas multi party system is good i the sense that it can keep the pressure on the government to perform. as left is doin in current scenario. though i do not support left parties tactics but still they r keeping a chack on congress party's action who is famous for harassing their opposition whn they r in power with majority.

Answer 10

Multi party system established to make ruling party responsible to the public Representatives to safe guard the interests of the people in a democratic country. But it became a mobocracy. Opposition party leaders are taking bribes to raise issues in the Parliament house. Horse-trading at times of hung results, splitting the party when ministerial berth is not allotted, giving contracts to the kith and kin, even selling the important documents to foreign countries and goonda ism prevalent in this system.Only cure is to impose dictatorship for a short time to eliminate un-wanted elements and to reshape democracy.