I understand what you saying, but keep in mind the Oscars are not based on what made the most money, what was hyped the most, or what was in the most theaters...
The Oscars are supposed to honor the best films in how they were created, the acting, the thought put into them, etc. Success is not always based on money and popularity ( although most films did quite well I'm sure).
If small Indie films seem boring, then they are simply not for you, or you are not giving them a chance, or your just too used to the recycled action-packed crap or poor humor used in a lot of hits. I'm not criticizing you though, so do not take it personally. I agree some films looked really boring to me but I'm sure that they were very well made and lots of creativity, skill, and thought were put into them. And also, you can't always judge a book by its cover.
2007-02-25 17:13:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Most big budget movies are simply popcorn flicks for the sake of entertainment and when they win awards it's usually for the eye or ear candy.
The acting awards often go to actors in smaller films because those movies sink or swim based on the strength of the actors and the writing. To be totally honest with you, I think you need to expand your movie horizons because many of the smaller independent films are much better than the average big budget studio tent pole.
Oh and by the way. Two of the most decorated movies in Academy Awards history are Titanic and Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. And in case you missed it, both of those movies made some serious money.
2007-02-25 17:11:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Justin H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
ok, you're making generalizations. You do could bear in mind that the Academy Awards is an marketplace experience. it is not approximately container workplace or extensive-unfold opinion. it extremely is approximately people who make videos recognizing different people who make videos. there are a number of politics in touch. That being reported, the videos are not consistently "imprecise." no person might call Lord of the rings, Gladiator, vast, Braveheart, The Silence of the Lambs, Rocky, The Godfather, The Sound of music, West section tale, Ben-Hur, Casablanca, or long previous with the Wind "imprecise." a ways from it! those video clips have been very extensive-unfold throughout their time and proceed to be so at present. additionally, i've got seen in line with danger fifty 5 to 60 of the suited image winners, and that i does no longer call maximum of them "weird and wonderful." The Academy is notoriously conservative, and is the reason why each and every thing from Brokeback Mountain to Pulp Fiction to celebrity Wars lost. i'm actually shocked that they picked night Cowboy, which may well be on the bold section even at present, and that grow to be back interior the '60s. So, do no longer hardship approximately it. each and every time i admire a action picture (Saving inner maximum Ryan, L.A. own, The 6th experience, Moulin Rouge!, Capote, fragrance of a woman, the your best option Stuff, Reds), i comprehend it extremely is going to lose suited image, yet that would not rely. And if I hate a action picture (Crash, a appealing ideas, Out of Africa, gigi, Oliver!), the Academy will probable like it. nevertheless, i admire what i admire, and the Academy has little touching on that.
2016-11-25 23:38:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by messenger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The big budget movie did win - what is your question?
And indie films aren't all boring. A lot of them are really good. Donnie Darko is one of my favorite movies.
2007-02-25 17:07:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Charles 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think it may be Pan's Labrinth.
2007-02-25 17:05:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sierra 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
its not about money, its about acting.
2007-02-25 17:13:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by James k 5
·
1⤊
0⤋