Nope. But they cheered Al Gore.
2007-02-25 16:30:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Good question. One would think that of those self-absorbed sh*ts could have simply expressed a wish for the safe return of our soldiers. That is hardly a controversial statement. Its called being human. F*ck Hollywood.
2007-02-26 01:14:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by F 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure why they would...most people get upset when politics come out in Hollywood. It's also quite liberal and I'm sure the majority of the people don't approve of the war in Iraq. Don't get me wrong, it's still possible to support troops and not the war but trying to explain that when already pressed for time in an acceptance speech could present problems. Plus I think almost everyone is sick and tired of hearing about it anyway.
2007-02-26 00:36:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kevin 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
No, but that's not bad or anything. The troops know that we love them and can't wait for them to come home. It doesn't have to be announced publicly all the time.
2007-02-26 00:29:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by GlitznGlamour 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I didn't either, and I wish i had. It's because of our soldiers that we have the freedon and pleasure of sitting back in our easy chairs, and enjoy being entertained. I doubt any of them had that opportunity.
2007-02-26 00:35:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by bella 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yep!
I was standin' next to what's his name, when he told what's her face, that that other dude's son's best friend's cousin went over to Iraq and he thought it was kinda cool.
J/K
2007-02-26 00:29:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rob P 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess they didn't want the Academy to get involved into Gov affairs.
2007-02-26 00:29:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lil' Gay Monster 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
iT WAS WEIRD- NO ONE MENTIONED THE WAR, OR ANNA NICOLE SMITH OR BRITNEY'S SHAVED HEAD OR pRESIDENT BUSH!
2007-02-26 00:42:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋