What do you rate the new ECW?

Question

1 being the lowest
10 being the highest

Answer 1

I think ECW could be good, they just need to push the superstars that the people like. Instead the superstars that Arn Anderson (ECW Writer & former wrestler) think needs pushed, get the push. An example is CM Punk was undefeated and when Paul Heyman was told to leave, he started to constantly loose as they pushed people like Hardcore Holly. They have obviously seemed to figure out this mistake as they seem to be pushing CM Punk once agian. They need to bring back Heyman as the head writer, not on tv though. He is the one that knows the right way for ECW to go.

Answer 2

4

Its not ECW, its an extension of the WWE using the ECW name. Its got some good talent, if they would utilize it to a better degree. But it lacks what made ECW popular in the first place. I'm not talking about the violent and brutal matches, they were merely the byproduct of what really made ECW stand out. It was not the WWF. It was an alternative. They didn't do things the same way that the big promotions WWF and WCW did. They carved out a new way and style. They took chances and went against traditional wrestling booking and matches. That is what really made ECW great. The mere fact that ECW is just an extension of the WWE means that it will never be the same as the ECW of old.

Answer 3

it is not ecw so 1. ECW was an indie fed that was started by most of the "ECW Originals" they answered the phones, took the tickets ran the concession stands a and even did all the clean up and set up. they also almost took down Vince. this 'new breed" woudl barely survive a true ECW match when the fans were encouraged to "bring your own weapons" back in the days of barb wire matches and serious extreme action. when is the last time they had an extreme rules match? not even one a week. it is pathetic and i feel sorry for the originals. there dream, there baby, there federation was bought out and is now being destroyed by vince.

Answer 4

I rate it a '0'. Why? Because I watched it last week and the ONLY weapon I saw used was a steel chair, and even it wasn't used to its full potential.

Call it ECW if you like, but it seems to have backtracked all the way through its Extreme/Hardcore era to its 'Eastern Championship Wrestling' days.

The indy promotions I work for do more hardcore in one show than ECW has since its return...

Answer 5

Extreme Expose gets an 11 out of 10 :-) and the whole rest of the show gets a -5.

Answer 6

My opinion is The more wrestling on TV the better. I would rather watch ECW than Dr. Phil......TNA is getting like WCW with its athletes and stories. Which is saying something good....For WCW was very good until the end........

Answer 7

i will give it a 6 on overall performance.
i would give even more but when ecw first started rvd and other exremists had a lot of confusion in the ring..But u gotta give it to them man...they are extreme

Answer 8

-10

Answer 9

6 for the expose

Answer 10

2 It's a watered down minor league training ground for the WWE.