I haven't heard to much on the massive US man hunt lately
Give up ?
Can't find one guy on dialisis ?
Whats with the propaganda anyway - Where is the big scary enemy of the US ? Still comanding troops from the bat cave ?
Dead and no one wants to speak ill of him now that he's gone to get his 10 virgins ?
Hey George I thought all of this terror was Osama - what happened to that ?
2007-02-25 15:00:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Satan returns!
So Bush lied and purposely decieved the American people is that what you are saying ?
2007-02-25 16:45:35 · update #1
SGT 0311
America that flew into Nicuagua to arrest thier president invaded Iraq on a lie and a whim after bombing Afganistan - America who is the only nation to use the Atomic weapon - And you want me to believe they are stalemated by diplomacy with places like Pakistan - get real What kind of weed do they hand you drones anyway
2007-02-25 16:48:11 · update #2
I hate to burst your bubble, but if I was a betting person I would put my life savings down that Bush knows exactly where he is at, and I think a deal was made with the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia, after all they are some of Bush's best friends, do the math.
2007-02-25 15:08:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Ironic isn't it, considering that Al Qaeda is now restrengthening and have rebuilt their training grounds. It had not been in Bushs' best interest to find him. He was the boogeyman used to constantly scare and it was used again and again in the 2002, 2004 and 2006 election cycles.
The Bin Laden family connection to the Bush one goes back over 30 years, so he isn't going to hunt too hard for him. Bush himself had said 6 months after 9/11 he was not too concerned about Bin Laden, he did not think of him that much.
The CIA search team that had been in place to hunt for the ******* was disbanded in 2006.
In addition 9/11 was the biggest thing for him to take this country from being a democracy and turning it into a unitary government, i.e. a monarchy because the republican led congress at the time neutered itself and did not want to ask the tough questions because their patriotism was going to be called into question.
Now if we had just crushed the SOBs when we had the chance we would not now have to be worrying about more possible casualties thanks to Al Qaeda with the help of our boneheaded policies from the Dimwit Administration
I have seen some people talk about how there has not been an attack since 2001. It seems they have forgotten the time period between the 1st Al Qaeda attack and the 2nd one-9 years. They are patient. Start relaxing if we make it past that time period and there is not another one.
2007-02-25 23:33:28 · answer #2 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You'd be happier if he were actively and successfully launching terror attacks against the U.S.?
Do you believe that he just decided "Oh the hell with it...I don't think I want to attack America anymore!"?
What exactly would make you "happy"? More terrorist attacks? Less attacks? No attacks? Public Osama? Hidden Osama? Dead Osama? Alive Osama? Osama on dialysis (note spelling)? Healthy Osama? Saddam still in power? Saddam out of power but alive? Free Saddam? Captured Saddam?
Go ahead...pick a POV and defend it, instead of this juvenile "I hate George Bush" crud. Sooner or later you need to stand FOR something, not simply take potshots and gloat over how witty you are.
2007-02-25 23:39:36 · answer #3 · answered by idlebud 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bush family are good friends and stock holders with Carlyle, the Bin Ladens are heads of Carlyle. Bush was never intending to do anything like he has proved to Osama Bin Laden.
2007-02-26 08:11:16 · answer #4 · answered by Mortica 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heres the deal... The best we can do is work with the other governments in finding him. He is most likely not in Afghanistan, but in Pakistan or Saudi. We are forced to work with those countries and share information. It is a frustrating process I know. He has a lot of money and a lot of powerful friends to hide him. There were so many rumors floating around and 90% of them were followed up on.
2007-02-25 23:15:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Personally I think he's dead. What's troubling about it is Bush's stupid attitude and tough guy statements about Osama. Did you know that the FBI could never find one shred of evidence connecting Osama to 9/11? Maybe thats why Bush doesn't care anymore, or perhaps never really did.
2007-02-25 23:38:21 · answer #6 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Republican and conservatives conveniently forget to bring up the fact that the s.o.b that master mined the attack on our country on September 11th is still not accounted for.
Bush will not be blamed for not finding Osama because the Bush lovers are too busy trying to convince us sane people that Bush is the best thing since Cheerios.
Scary.
2007-02-25 23:15:30 · answer #7 · answered by Seldom Seen 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
To find Osama you gotta wanna find him. When you consider that Bush and family are buddies and business partners with the Saudi Royal Family and the Bin Laden family one would expect there would be no reason to be in any hurry to find Osama.
2007-02-25 23:06:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
George is frightened about bin laden. he is just trying to close the matter and make people forget about it. but he is going to receive a big blow from laden
2007-02-25 23:08:12 · answer #9 · answered by huggybaby 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
George doesn't listen to the american people, just the voices in his head.
2007-02-25 23:05:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋