English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why dont people want sex ed to be explict, detailed and realisitic.?


Makes no sense...


In any other subject you would not want as little detail as possible, in an as unrealisitc way as possible with as little visual material as possible.



imagine if you applied the keep it as little as possible thinking to driving...


Imagine... thats the truny wheel, the go faster peddle, the slow down peddle, lesson over now be good and take precautions... heres the key to dads car.



Surelye the more detail the less myths/bull poop you get, the more explicit, the less misunderstading you get.

And the more reslitic, the more people will relate and believe it when it comes to doing it for real.

I mean imagine having driving lessons on a computer game with micky mouse cartoons infront of you, with 10 lives.

Or like Daytona.

Makes no sense.


All sex is, is part of love making which people do as like each other, form couples, fall in love, and maybe form families

2007-02-25 14:27:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Adolescent

Plus the reason for long posts and details is obvious,.


If there are say 10 ways you can get pregnant and school only covered say 3.

That means 70% get pregnant as thought what they were doing was safe.

Likewise if 5 ways are the subject of myths going around saying you cant get pregnant if you do A,B and C and you dont point out its bull and back it up... How many get pregnant due to things that if you do A, B and C you dont get pregnant or stds.


So surely it makes sense to cover ALL the things you need to know and cover all mythes so no gaps or mistakes get made/


Plus sex and love and realtioships are not a bad thing.

Part of life leading to the most joy be it falling in love, marrage, or your 3 some or whatever with the passion being inspiration for art and music etc.

You just need to follow the safety rules.


Plus why mention marriage when that is unlikly till 28.

and teenagers will be sexaully active from 16.

2007-02-25 21:54:44 · update #1

Ie none of this missionary position nonsese.

Cover all the kissing, feeling up, foreplay, in environments like nightclubs, parties, your house, car, local golf course etc.


Covering things like bjs and orgasims (especailly as safer and done before sex)

Why guys and girls are into different things, realtioships and what happens when rejected or dumped. How girls and guys communicate diff, how to deliver a baby and look after it and how it wrecks your life.


Ie EVERYTHING

2007-02-25 21:56:53 · update #2

***************************

Quote
Sex ed should just be the basics and thats all kids need to know until they are about 15/16 and become sexually active


This is why all these teenagers get pregnant thinking jumping up and down is a good contrception and pulling out works too... ie you teach basics, the gap is filled with ****.

2007-02-27 08:00:54 · update #3

7 answers

my sex ed consisted of looking at some woman in a picture with her legs open and a baby's head crowning - nice! if teenagers know more then they are less likely to get pregnant not more.
my 6 year old saw a condom packet and asked me what it was so I told him its to put over your willy when you get older to stop having babies - he said o.k. and went off to play. tell kids the truth but not great tricks - let them discover that themselves

2007-02-26 09:17:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Okay this is my theory. my parents are like this too. People figure that if you show more to teens it builds curiosity. At the same time they wont show it because they might see it as showing young people how to approach sex and how to do it etc. They wont show it because they are scared.OR..my OTHER theory is that they wont show explicit stuff because it can be a soft porn and ...porn industries would rather you pay for it then have it free. When I think about it, it sorta desensitizes kids. .. It depends on how people view sex. I see it as spiritual andpowerful, a marriage deal. I'm not a swinger to say its an open discussion and should read as any other subject. ...Who knows, when I was younger, we didnt have sex ed. ...I saw a condom when I was like 17 for the first time LMAO!

2007-02-26 02:17:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sex ed classes are down to how embaressed the teachers are.
Also how open they are
Sex ed should not only be a teacher explaining but a question and answer session.
I am 36 and sex ed was useless at my school but i had a very open teacher who allowed us to ask anything, So we did she was very imformative but obviously our questions where limited.
Sex ed should be hugh on the curiculum and in as much detail as the children can take.
Try not to let the teacher run the class totaly and take a risk and ask the question thats on your mind.

2007-02-26 19:25:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think you are a man who thinks with his pen*s too much and not with his other thinking tool...your brain. I would be horrified if my daughter came home and spurted out a whole load of tripe about sex at the age of 11/12 I would report the school. Sex ed should just be the basics and thats all kids need to know until they are about 15/16 and become sexually active

2007-02-27 01:43:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

one subject is for effective: i'm going extra advantageous then you definately did with this question!! because of the fact my subject is that if those anti-abortionists attempt to tell me that i will not be able to have an abortion, then they could pay for the child's help. even with each and every thing, that's my determination to make, not theirs, and that's my physique, not theirs, that's my wellbeing, not theirs. have you ever observed that that's specifically adult males who're anti-abortion and professional-existence???? I questioned continuously what supplies them the splendid to tell any stranger what to do: i'm a finished stranger to them, I take place to have a intense hereditary sickness, as properly to that can not take the pill or the shot, and that they prefer to tell me i will not be able to have an abortion? Oh properly, then they could pay for the child, superb?? in spite of everything, they don't look to be investment because of the fact they have no funds, this is the completed ingredient. And so some distance as intercourse-ed is going: i actually have confidence that it is the duty of mum and dad not the government. the government did not placed me in this international, so the government shouldn't could be in charge for my intercourse-ed. My mum and dad did that, and that i did that for my toddlers. Neither my daughter nor my son had any issues. My daughter replace into married for 2 years in the previous she have been given pregnant, and my son advised me to attend 10 years for a grandchild. I knowledgeable them on all I knew, and that i'm incredibly effective they're going to show their toddlers on all they comprehend. In essence, it is not something yet hippocrytes: they prefer to have the skill to tell you what to do, yet they don't prefer that can assist you, this is the final analysis. If I could have a newborn because of the fact those professional-lifers get their way, then those professional-lifers additionally must grant concepts to elevating undesirable toddlers or disabled toddlers, and that they could pay for them.....

2016-10-16 12:13:01 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

education is for industry, if you want to know something read a book! If you want to live like the animals just do what comes naturally! books however will not teach about abstinance and chastity unless the book you are reading is the bible.

2007-02-27 02:36:38 · answer #6 · answered by byrdland5d@btopenworld.com 4 · 1 0

IGNORANCE, people try to pretend if they do not talk about something it will not happen or go away.

2007-02-25 23:55:20 · answer #7 · answered by badmikey4 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers