Suns.
Their record shows and they have been consistent in what they are doing for the last 3 years. Plus the suns revolutionized the game with they style of play. Definitely entertaining and effective
2007-02-25 16:24:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Noy_Pi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Short term the Suns do but for the future the lakers. Just one player away and some seasoning the Andrew
2007-02-25 15:44:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mannie Fresh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Right now the Suns are better,but when the Lakers are healthy its much closer.The Lakers almost knocked them out of the playoffs last year. They still need a good point guard to be an elite team though. Nash is soooooo overrated.
2007-02-25 14:03:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by scorer 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a Laker fan, the Suns by far are better. A better question would be who's better Mavs or Suns.
2007-02-25 15:39:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Suns
2007-02-25 14:36:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by roni26 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lakers would be the better team if the had a good PG to set up Kobe. But as of now, sadly, it is the suns
go lakers!
2007-02-25 13:58:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
the suns, the lakers are just a one person no matter what anyone says, the suns have a starting lineup that could all be in the all-star game
2007-02-25 14:05:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
only an idiot would still say that the lakers are still only kobe. he's taking 7 less shots a game...which means 7 more shots (and potentially 21 more points) for his teammates. but lakers are injury prone, and lack a solid experienced point guard. one good pass can alter a game.
suns ...as of right now. i say in a year or two...lakers will be contenders again.
2007-02-25 14:25:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
right now the suns this season but lakers overall have been better.
2007-02-25 13:58:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by chris k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the lakers arent a team. the lakers are kobe, and thats it. therefore the suns team will again take them in a seven game series due to the kobes lack of depth
2007-02-25 14:00:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by fadnsrtjuresmr 2
·
1⤊
2⤋