English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this going to be another bully on those who dont have WMD?

The Russians, even US allies like the British, Japan, China and all the rest of the world look at Bush & Co. as a real confused institution.

The world prefer to have a talk to that one person than to kill millions (again).

Why not stop the aggression, & get to know others. Because if US hit Iran, Syria or N.Korea, it will trigger WW3.

If, (I say IF,) there be a really FAIR WW3 with NO WMD, please DO NOT ever dream of US victory. China, Japan, Russia, will hit all the satelites. You cant see & you cant communicate well. Welcome back to the WW2. Those countries have learnt well. And dont forget, US won in WW2 merely due to the usage of WMD (the atomic bomb that hit Hiroshima, for ground battles US have poor records, not to mention that lots of silly mistakes done by the army, the so-called "friendly fires".)

And any mistake made by Bush, the US soils have greater chances of becoming a complete disaster.

2007-02-25 13:42:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

To : a.bush.fa

In CNN news yesterday, no such evidence. Most analysts dismissed the claim that Iran is supplying weapons to Iraq, this is due to that almost all attack are done by the fallen regime Sunnis to the Syiites. It is impossible that Iran (Shiites) supply weapons to the Sunnis.

2007-02-25 14:56:05 · update #1

To: Syd6 1967, Phaiscool, Seraphim, Billy D.

Thanks for answers, some are quite funny.

********************************

2007-02-25 15:04:50 · update #2

To Thisis:

North Korea's nuclear is a crap?

In WW2, US domination in Asia pacific rim prior to the Atomic bomb? You have to do more research.

By the way, get out of your cave. I have to wake you up that you and me are in today's world of globalization, and I am not in the US, and Y!A participants are people from all around the world, observing you and giggling at 'naive' Americans like you.

2007-02-25 15:32:01 · update #3

8 answers

North Korea can shoot back....Iran can't....

2007-02-25 15:17:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

North Korea is much less of a threat than they were a year ago. They called their own bluff. Their nuclear test was an unmitigated failure, so they have no choice but to deal with the world.

Iran has yet to show their hand on nuclear weapons. They could be bluffing entirely, they could already have several bombs, or they could be anywhere in between. Also, Iran is largely sponsoring the continued violence in Iraq. Depending on how you look at it, you could say we're already fighting Iran. We're just doing it in Iraq. And Iran's leader is publicly declaring his intention to destroy Israel, one of our closest allies. I'm not sure of this, but we're probably bound by treaty to defend Israel, if they're attacked.

As for WWII, we beat Germany without nuclear weapons. And we pushed Japan out of almost all of the territory they'd conquered, without nuclear weapons. And we did this WHILE beating Germany. Japan's energy supply had been cut off, and they's lost control over the industrial regions of China. Even without an invasion, Japan had lost most of it's ability to fight a modern war.

If you hate the United States so much, why are you here? I'm not asking you to leave, I'm just wondering why you choose to live in a country you believe to be evil, and incompetant.


Edit-
Did you even hear about the North Korean nuclear test? There's debate about whether they even achieved fission at all. If they did, it was the lowest yeild nuclear bomb ever detonated.

Are the Americans you giggle at the same ones who know world history? Why did the Japanese allow the Enola Gay to take off from Tinnian, if they were still in complete control of the Pacific? What made Japan decide to walk away from Midway? Manilla? Iwo Jima? I could go on. I guess they just got tired of their empire. Hitler must have, too.

I'm glad to hear that you don't infest my country. But wherever you live, there's a very good chance it's a place that American men died to liberate

2007-02-25 14:20:39 · answer #2 · answered by Thisisnotmyrealname 2 · 0 0

No. Nuclear assaults in basic terms bring about hundreds of thousands of harmless deaths. and whether anybody in Iran replace into for some reason a despicable terrible individual, it might in basic terms bring about nuclear conflict. there is no way that ought to ever be a great thign.

2016-10-16 12:09:33 · answer #3 · answered by croes 4 · 0 0

North Korea is not in the Middle East, and controlling the Middle East keeps us at super power status.

2007-02-25 14:03:08 · answer #4 · answered by Seraphim 3 · 0 0

N. Korean's neighbors are not herding Cattle's in the USA

N. Korean's neighbor's are not grooming dogs for the US Congress and White House

2007-02-25 13:56:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iran has a history of giving weapons to terrorists. That is why Russia won't give Iran any uranium (Russia will control all uranium in Iran's Russian nuclear reactors). Russia doesn't want a Iranian nuclear bomb to explode in Russia.

Iran has taken it upon itself to refine its own uranium. They have done that with the help of China.

IRAN GIVES WEAPONS TO TERRORISTS
A ship carrying Iranian weapons was stopped and boarded.
Weapons Found on 'Karine-A' and 'Santorini'
http://www.waronline.org/analysis/pal/weaponry.jpg
"fifty tons of weapons into the hands of Yasir Arafat's Palestinian Authority"http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=1471

IRAN BOMBS SOLDIERS IN IRAQ.
"Blair warns Iran over Iraq bombs
British Prime Minister Tony Blair has issued a warning to Iran, saying "information" linked it to recent bomb attacks on British troops in Iraq. "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4315924.stm
Iraq bombs 'clearly from Iran'
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/08/10/iran.iraq/

IRAN WANTS KIDS TO BE SUICIDE BOMBERS
http://memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=906
The video clip shows "irib 3"
"IRIB" stands for "Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting" which means it is a government channel.

IRAN USED BOMBS IN THE AMERICAS
Even after Argentina agreed to help Iran with its nuclear program.
"Iran blamed for Argentina bomb"
"Earlier this year, Argentine Judge Juan Jose Galeano also issued warrants for the arrest of 12 Iranians in relation to the attack...
These included Iran's ambassador to Argentina at the time of the bombing, Hadi Soleimanpour, whose arrest in the UK sparked a major diplomatic row between Iran and Argentina and between Iran and the UK. "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3245641.stm

2007-02-25 13:47:57 · answer #6 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 0 1

If you knew about international diplomacy (which you obviously don't), then you'd know that this is intentional.

The USA and the EU play good cop bad cop with all of these rogue nations.

2007-02-25 14:14:52 · answer #7 · answered by billy d 5 · 0 1

north korea doesn't have any oil.

2007-02-25 13:53:09 · answer #8 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers