Guiliani did clean up ny before 9/11. Check his record, and yes he used a stiff arm. How else does someone protect the ones they care about? More chaos??? GET SMART!!
I think he would do a great job, especially considering he has been in a national emergency which means he can handle another situation better than someone who has not physically been in charge when it was going on.
It's easy to say, "here's what I would do!!" But that is not the same as actually doing it, knowing that people are dying as the seconds lag on. We cannot rest our hopes on someone who is not experienced and risk a mistake that will cost excess lives to be lost.
2007-02-25 14:53:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by ringolarry 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I do believe he would make great strides in not only cleaning up crime in our Country and I believe he and Newt Gingrich are the only two with the intelligence, strength and truly would put U.S.'s security above personal politics. I also believe that these two are the only ones who will deal with the illegal immigration problem in a non-poplitical way.
I hope the next President will be a president for all the people not just their party or wealthy contributors and lobbyists.
2007-02-25 14:33:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
NOT!!! Why not?
Giuliani is arrogant, bigoted, ill tempered and a womanizer. He divorced his 2nd wife, Donna Hanover, by announcing it at a press conference instead of telling her first. He was having an affair with an aide while living at Gracie Mansion & while still married and mayor of NY and he took credit for all the good things that were done by others in NYC. He fired William Bratton; the police commissioner in 1994 when he found out he made the cover of Time magazine because he (Giuliani) wanted to take the credit for the innovative crime fighting. I lived in NY during his dictatorship, and believe me, I would not want him as president. His character is far worse than Bush & Clinton's worse faults rolled into one, if you can believe that's possible. His name should be Mussoliani.
As for 9/11…. he’s no hero, he just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The real heroes of 9/11 were the NYC firefighters & police plus all the other forces from the surrounding tri-state areas who voluntarily came to pitch in & help us.”
OK, here'a a link from Newsweek:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17081159/sit...
About his resume:
http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=7ebb4b22-83ac-4da6-8073-c70a66166ea5
2007-02-25 13:36:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Ok horrible **** happened, and then things went well, but it is inconcievable to think that just because he is the mayor of NY during 911, he is the man for the job. And really being mayor isn't that hard.
2007-02-25 14:21:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Baby 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The President has little influence over city governments.
2007-02-25 14:00:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't vote for Guiliani. He's a big government conservative who would expand the war and undermine our freedoms more than GWB. He'd be the Nixon to Bush's LBJ. We don't need Guiliani. We need Ron Paul.
2007-02-25 13:38:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No I would not vote for him. I believe everything you said. In addition to that how would anyone be able to clean up a toilet. impossible.
I recall years ago of how Pres. Clinton, Then Gov. Clinton straightened out Arkansas. Most fell for that one too.
In addition to having low morals, he is nothing but hype.
2007-02-25 13:50:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by scallywag 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
you're completely fooling your self in case you think of Giuliani wiped sparkling up NYC. The crime cost in NYC began to drop interior the third 12 months of his predecessor, Dinkins, and interior the countrey as an entire 3 years till now he took workplace. Giuliani grow to be the beneficiary of a countrywide vogue, and claimed credit. he's the fool who positioned the city's Emergency administration center interior the international commerce center after the 1993 attack made this of course a foul theory, and all the pros informed him it shpould bypass into an out of how development in an outer borough. I labored on a cable television information coach whilst he first ran for Mayor, and collectively as he welcomed video clips of him giving arranged speeches, he definitely prevented any interviews, in basic terms chatting with those extensive-unfold to those persons interior the media as shills or softballers. do no longer have confidence somebody like that. His bags with 2 ex-better halves, one a cousin (securing the redneck vote?), one residing with their babies interior the mayoral mansion and nevertheless married to him collectively as he introduced his woman buddy abode, will weigh with some voters. His entire hostility to minority communities will harm, on account that they now comprise on the factor of one of 5 voters. He has completely no journey in distant places affairs. it extremely is in many circumstances conquer, and won't impact many citizens, in spite of the undeniable fact that it counts with me, in line with danger because of fact I even have been in and labored in places the u . s . is threatening to attack, like Iran. His perspectives on what the the fewer clever press loves to play up as arguable stands, collectively with abortion and gun administration, rely little.
2016-11-25 23:21:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by shake 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Assuming that he can get anybody to vote for him, considering his less then moral past, his stand on abortion and gay marriage. How many deep south, bible thumping neo-cons do you think will vote for him. Maybe he would be better off just to get his broom out and go back to sweeping the streets of N.Y.
2007-02-25 13:37:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Gee according to Riddler He certainly DOES have the qualifications
sounds like he is following in Bill Clinton's footsteps
ALL the ear markings -- a Monica even!
2007-02-25 13:39:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by sapphire_630 5
·
1⤊
2⤋