ok if time is relative and thinking takes time then thinking is relative?
then thinking in a higher dimension is not necessary so that immediately makes you all knowing?
2007-02-25 13:06:40 · 3 answers · asked by stronger_than_satan1 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Absolutely thinking is relative. For example, your perception is that your thinking is smarter than my thinking, but my perception is that my thinking is smarter than yours.
2007-02-25 13:11:36 · answer #1 · answered by Scythian1950 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Everything is a relative truth. higher and lower dimensions are relative in perception.
day and night, good and bad, sweet and sour.
Even the concept of all mighty or God is a relative truth.
Only death and birth are absolute truth.
thnks
2007-02-25 13:16:19 · answer #2 · answered by mandira_nk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see the connection between the 1'st and 2'nd parts of your argument.
But it *is* possible that neural structures called 'microtubules' can interact with local quantum fields to effect the equivalent of quantum computing (where the problem is worked simultaneously by in infinite number of computations spread across the Multiverse)
So........ You may be right âº
Doug
2007-02-25 13:17:57 · answer #3 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋