If you criticized the WMD's in Iraq, what do you think about this??:?

Question

Iraqi military spies reported to the CIA that there were WMD in Iraq, that Saddam knew this, and Russia actually helped transport them to Syria before the U.S. search in Iraq.

A third Iraqi intel agent has come forward to confirm this with satellite images of the russian transport vehicles moving loads from Iraq into Syria in 2002.

What I'd like to know is why isn't this all over the media yet?? Are they afraid of admitting to the chaos they've caused??

Before the US led invasion of Iraq, Russian Spetznatz forces assisted Saddam in removing WMD’s (bio and chemical weapons stores), by transporting them to Syria.

Three sources now concur:
The three are:
General Al-Tikriti, Saddam’s southern regional commander who defected just before the invasion;

General Georges Sada, the second in command of Iraq’s Air Force; and

Ion Pacepa, former head of Romanian intelligence, a man with special knowledge of the back-channel arms deals between Russia and Saddam’s Iraq.

ah....Im assuming that our government DID NOT KNOW

ah....Im assuming that our government DID NOT KNOW that the wmd's were moved when our troops went in....did you miss that part??

Answer 1

You are smart all over. The democrats will bite the dust in 2008. The media is controlled by liberal politics. If the media had reported the WMD findings correctly the Presidents approval rating would have been in the high 70's and 80's. The Republicans would have not lost both houses. If we pull out of Iraq we will be sitting ducks, and we will have more 9-11's, Speaker Pelosi has no idea what they are doing by bringing the troops home. By fighting over there we are keeping the war over there.

Answer 2

There was no evidence of Iraqi military spies or WDM. We, through the UN, were addressing the evidence of of WMD in Iraq with inspectors who were managing th get around Saddam's attempts of hindrance. There was indication of WMD by the CIA. It was apparent the the powers in the White House had misinterpreted the CIA conclusions made up their own versions.

There has never been any evidence of Russia sending in trucks to move weapons of WMD nor was their any hint of this by the UN inspectors in the region. If you want to look into mistakes and misdirection look to the White House. You can see these types of subterfuge through most of the recent pres indents in regions around the world. Too bad so many Americans don't seem to give a damn about the US criminal activities around the world with the misuse of troops and the CIA.

I believe the US media is afraid to report properly about what is going on.

Answer 3

you quoted no source ,
even the relibility of a post on yahoo must be questioned
these iraqui ''spies'' which military were they spieing for?

what torture was done on these spies in what country[egypt?] [wantonimo] [israel]???

sadam knew this what where how did the spies confirm that sadam knew?

drawing russia in is a stroke of brilliance get the cold war a bit hotter right? work on fears biases?old chestnuts?
oh managed to include israels nemisis syria as well you got all the dots joined eh bro ?

som now we have a third spie but this one is an intel agent so must be better source right?
he confirms in words pictures
you got the pictures?
he hasve the pictures cheeny had pictures ,mossad has pictures of loads of transport veghicles [during the oil embargo? mooving oil perhaps?? to syria ,great from iran INTO syria
great intell there bro

Answer 4

If WMD were in Syria, then we attacked the wrong country. Maybe Syria will be next?

I suspected from the start that anything illegal had been moved to Syria. It didn't take a genius to figure that out.

If your "intelligence" is correct there was no reason to attack Iraq..........

Answer 5

The main stream media has no interest in reporting the truth about WMDs. The media just wants to make our President look bad. The media is run by a bunch of left wings liberals.

Answer 6

we know why we went to war with iraq. Dubya had to finish what daddy started, but didn't complete. He had to get saddam outta there, and he did. He didn't care who died in the process. Whether saddam had WMD's or not, it wasn't going to stop chimpy from winning a personal battle against saddam, for papa!

Answer 7

Saddam was a tyrrant and in many respects a shrewd one at that and seeing the inevitable he may well have gone back through whatever remaining WMD he might have had and got rid of them by hook or by crook in order to prove the WMD charge to be entirely false after the fact.
That said:

We invaded Iraq not because Saddam was strong and an immediate threat but rather he was weak, problematic and control of Iraq and it’s resources would be strategically advantageous.
The tactical reasons are obvious. The Oil and Iraq’s strategic location from the stand point of military bases in order to control oil resources in the entire region.
The political motives are more complex.
Bush Junior and his cabinet for the most part objected to Bush senior leaving Sadam in power after the first Gulf war.
Sanctions started by Bush Sr. and carried on by two terms in office by Clinton had left Iraq in a terrible state in which corrupt government continued to prosper and carry out excesses against any that would oppose them, all the while at the expense of the people who perished to the tune of 1.5 million or more( mostly children) due primarily to lack of proper nutrition , lack of potable water, and lack of proper Medical attention all of which Saddam was able to blame on the West’s policy of Sanctions.
The motivation for them to carry out the invasion when they did and the way that they did was 9/11.
“Make hay while the sun shines”
Prior to 9/11 another major military invasion into Iraq was a hard sell to make to the American people.
In the words of PNAC (the Neo Conservative “ Project for the New American Century” ) an event on the order of Pearl Harbor was needed in order to gain the public support required to do so .
So it was not so much because they thought Iraq was responsible for 9/11 but more because 9/11 enabled them to gain the public support they needed to carry out the invasion and implement the mission statement of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC).
Again it was the OIL and Military bases they were/are ultimately after, WMD and Alkaeda connections were used as tools of propaganda and 9/11 served to justify and bolster the propaganda . IMHO The Administration felt confident it would be easy enough to find enough Al Kaeda members in the general population and enough WMD bits and pieces scattered about to back up their rhetoric once they demonstrated to the world that a thriving and secure Iraq was setting a model of Democracy in the Mid East.

It seems to me considering what actually developed out of all this the only honorable course of action left is that of reconciliation, reconstruction, and repairing the public security as best we can without overtly taking sides or trying to micro-manage a Civil War.
Unfortunately Iraqi’s have been left with little alternative but to fight it out till it burns out and some power emerges that restores public security.
This is not a solution but rather a situation that has arisen out of circumstance.
Plans of continuing on with overt demands for Private US oil exploitation, political manipulation and usury as a Military base of operations to expand the war on into Iran and Syria and restoring public security have been severally jeopardized through shear ineptitude, dishonesty and deceit carried out by the Administration.
If Bush would get off his high horse and agree to talk things over with Iran a little it might well take a lot of pressure off the situation.
Iran .
The major driving force behind Iran’s nuclear program is the threat of a US military invasion.
They may well agree to back off of that situation and cooperate further with routing out terrorists and help secure the peace in Iraq if only they were given the chance to engage in a more rational diplomatic discussion other than Bushes Texas Cowboy rhetoric of " You do not speak with your enemy"
If he only took time to know his enemy he may well find out that he is not really his enemy at all.
Jesus said something to the effect that in order to remove the spec from the eye of the enemy you must first remove the log in your own eye.

Answer 8

then we would have to attack Syria too, and right now we set our site on Iran.

Answer 9

No links of course.
How bout a link to this story?
A reputable link please.
Not a mental patients blog.

Answer 10

and i thought saddam buried them . thanks for the info