I mean seriously, if more women were pregnant more often we wouldn't have to deal with PMS, plus you get a baby out of the deal. Win/win for everyone, right?
2007-02-25 10:45:59 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No, I do not agree. Are you going to stay pregnant for the rest of your life? No, so you might as well learn to deal with PMS.
2007-02-25 10:50:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Pregnancy is like PMS times 1000.
2007-02-26 16:31:20 · answer #2 · answered by Chewie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, wouldn't you be hella grumpy if you had to get morning sickness, become a good deal larger than you're used to being, have a mass of confusing hormones racing around making you cry or scream or have emotional fits, eject a small human from a hole in the middle of your body, then lose 98% of the sleep you should be getting to said small human crying at all hours...? Lad, PMS would be a picnic next to that.
2007-02-25 18:57:20 · answer #3 · answered by The Mad Shillelagh 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It does make sense, but instead of a chick having PMS that lasts a few days, she will be having cravings that you have to satisfy, morning sickness that you have to hear, hormones that you have to deal with, weight gain you have to look at, new clothes you have to pay for and complaints you have to listen to - for 9 months!
And then, you have to look after a child for the next 16-18 years.
Besides, the best option is a hysterectomy.
2007-02-25 18:50:13 · answer #4 · answered by sarahmuffin4 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO! if their were more kids think of how much work that would be for everyone. more food and other supplies and more income would be needed. and eventually she will be so mad at you for all of the 9 months you give her she will give you a years worth of PMS in just a week so no that's not a good idea.
2007-02-25 18:53:37 · answer #5 · answered by Dog Luva 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No PMS will come back after the baby is born.
2007-02-25 18:51:18 · answer #6 · answered by Renji 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, my mum skipped about 70 periods because of pregnancy. And babies are much, much cuter than ladies with pms.
2007-02-25 18:50:57 · answer #7 · answered by my german self 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, actually there's so many more hormonal changes in pregnancy, it would make PMS look like a holiday. So, truly it wouldn't be win/win. Sorry to burst your bubble. ~~~
2007-02-25 18:50:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
No, because as soon as they have a baby they get their periods back and the pms starts again.
2007-02-25 18:49:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do agree but I am not the motherly type. I have them and better have someone to help me with the baby till it's about 8 months old. Sure sounds good to me if the man enjoys taking care of newborns. I ain't.
:P
2007-02-25 18:54:30 · answer #10 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋