2007-02-25 10:38:13 · 7 answers · asked by The Lamb of Vista 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I can't figure that out either...It should have been legal years ago...
I am a 55 year old grandmother and everyone I know would be for legalized pot..
2007-02-25 10:46:47 · answer #1 · answered by Frann 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the only reason i can work out is that there are various strengths of hashish, different than that there are much extra risky issues including alcohol and particular criminal drugs that do extra harm. it ought to correctly be a actuality that smoking to lots can impact some those with paranoia and assorted different issues, yet no one looks to suggestions the outcomes of a moist suggestions, liver issues and the quantity of deaths brought about quickly or in a roundabout way by using alcohol. I certainly have yet to work out every person start up a combat after taking hashish, incredibly the choice, it mellows human beings out. the quantity of people with intense issues because of the fact of hashish are minute whilst in comparison with the quantity of people with issues by using alcohol. As for it being addictive, i'd say that for the period of basic terms an extremely tiny volume of people get hooked on it. I smoked it incredibly oftentimes for variety of two years and had no yearnings whilst i ended. i will not be able to assert a similar of as quickly as I gave up alcohol. I additionally by no skill had any compulsion to objective the different drugs. human beings additionally get prescriptions for drugs that are much extra addictive and damaging than hashish, like diazipan working example. There are whether many sorts of hashish and the better ones could have hilusinatory outcomes, so i don't recommend those, because of the fact of this it may well be so not basic to legalise.
2016-10-16 11:48:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Congress. They are the ones that would have to make it legal again...and of course the FDA who classifies it as "dangerous." I don't think it is and I have seen positive results from people who have used the drug medicinally. Of course the FDA is owned by the pharmaceutical companies and they don't want to have it legalized because then they would loose out BIG time on money which could be made from harsher drugs that they create.
2007-02-25 10:47:20 · answer #3 · answered by hera 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Surgeon General and lawmakers based on recommendations from that office?
2007-02-25 10:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the DEA and they are just protecting their paychecks, just as a dog protects a bone it was given.
2007-02-25 10:46:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no one person. There is general knowledge of the problems that legalizing it would cause.. and so it's against the law due to the public will.
2007-02-25 10:41:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
Americans. They are too irresponsible to have another drug legalized. A few bad seeds ruin it for you all.
2007-02-25 10:41:55 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋