2007-02-25 10:27:57 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
Detroit was much better with Big Ben. Just look at the stats, wins, championships etc. The're still a good team, the addition of Webber has definitely helped...I mean his shot won them the game against Chicago today. The only fault in his game is his pitiful free throw shooting. I can't believe a NBA player can shoot less than 50%..even Shaq has gotten somewhat better. Get him some work with a shooting coach, the SPurs got one for Duncan and Parker and now they're pretty decent at the charity stripe.
Detroit was better with Big Ben !
2007-02-25 10:33:12 · answer #1 · answered by Scott M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Detroit with no question was better with Ben. They won 64 games with him.
2007-02-25 20:16:27 · answer #2 · answered by Delwar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better at rebounding, not as good offensively. CWebb is a good fit, though. And Chicago needed the toughness inside, where as Detroit still has that persona. All in all, I believe it actually worked for everybody. The ultimate test is upcoming, the playoffs.
2007-02-25 18:41:57 · answer #3 · answered by Patrick H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pistions were better with Ben Wallace. When he went to the Bulls then he made the Bulls better. The Pistions are still good because they still have a lot of good players including Chris Webber and many more.
2007-02-25 18:30:47 · answer #4 · answered by Josh D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Piston is better when ben wallace is there because his role is fitted to the team and the way he played physical
2007-02-25 18:33:36 · answer #5 · answered by Joni J 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked him in Detroit.. He was their power house and he seems to have made Chicago better but not as good as detroit was with him ... I just liked hearing him announced :)...
2007-02-25 18:38:07 · answer #6 · answered by TheyCallMeMom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
haha, are u kidding me? that ben guy sucks, he only scored 5 points today, he missed most of the free throws and and he didnt even get the dunk right ever, he missed everyhitng almost. he was only good in defense, he might be a good player but he really sucked today when i saw him play for the first time, in bulls vs. pistons
2007-02-25 18:37:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely better. They've been struggling to fill his void ever since. He fit very well with that team. He's not as good with the Bulls, and the Pistons aren't as good without him.
2007-02-25 18:33:24 · answer #8 · answered by Big Z 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better cause he did a lot of dunking and a lot of people knew him. He was one of the most popular Pistons.
2007-02-25 18:30:51 · answer #9 · answered by BCM 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better
2007-02-25 18:48:35 · answer #10 · answered by Nightflyer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋