what are your opinions?
2007-02-25 09:27:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Pro choice. If a woman was raped, she should not have to keep the baby.
2007-02-25 10:11:28 · answer #1 · answered by C L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the argument "it's the woman's body, it's her choice, not the government's" is to be held up, they there needs to be some "fairness" applied to it.
If it's the woman has the right to decide what happens with the baby growing inside of her, then the male humanoid involved (not always good enough to be called a 'man') has the right to decide what type of assistance to provide after the baby is born.
If the woman gets 100% of the choice as to whether or not the baby lives, then the male involved has the choice as to whether or not he should support said child. I guess that's his way of getting a vote in the abortion arena.
2007-02-25 17:39:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pro life. Sorry, but pro choice is whose choice? The baby's or the mothers? Seems the unborn should have just as much choice as the mother. Seems the mother already made her choice unless it is those unfortunate cases of rape.
2007-02-25 17:37:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are other forms of birth control. I am pro choice in the fact that if I didn't want a baby I would use some sort of birth control. Abortion is not birth control and it has gotten way out of hand.
2007-02-25 17:32:37 · answer #4 · answered by Pamela V 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
PRO CHOICE IS THE BELIEVING IN THE RIGHT TO DECIDE FOR YOURSELF WHAT IT IS YOU WANT TO DO. THERE ARE ENOUGH CHILDREN IN THIS WORLD WHO ARE NOT LOOKED AFTER IN THE MANNER THEY DESERVE AS IT IS! THERE ARE A MILLION REASONS TO HAVE A BABY AND A MILLION FOR NOT HAVING A BABY. EITHER WAY THE CHOICE AND REASONING ARE YOURS AND YOURS ALONE, BECAUSE IN THE END IT IS YOU THAT HAS TO LIVE WITH THE DECISION NOT ANYONE ELSE. GOOD LUCK!
2007-02-26 04:39:45 · answer #5 · answered by Bekinder 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pro Life.
I find it funny that the pro choicers have all already been born.
The baby in Fla that was born at 21 weeks gestation.....doesn't that speak volumes!
Some people are still murdering babies at that same gestation and up to 27 weeks all the while trying to convince themselves that the baby is not valiable. Thank God this child was matched with the mother she was matched with. At least she has a chance.
2007-02-25 17:34:47 · answer #6 · answered by Lisa 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Abortion for me is not an option, it is still murder in cold blood. I have nothing against artificial forms of birth control. Use the pill, condoms, IUD, whatever you like but once the child is conceived, she is alive already not just a lump of flesh and blood as some would have us believe. May we make good choices for our unborn babies. They deserve to live.
2007-02-25 20:06:00 · answer #7 · answered by Lewie's Mom 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's a really tough one...If a woman is raped for example, would it be better to bring the child up in this world? I think the woman must go through court, to prove that abortion is the only option. This way, people won't replace abortions with contraceptives, and safe sex will be practiced more often.
2007-02-25 17:38:06 · answer #8 · answered by Chris_Knows 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am pro-choice, because the unborn have no one to speak for them and they did not ask to be created. So killing them is not an option for me.
2007-02-25 18:40:07 · answer #9 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am personally Pro-life.
2007-02-25 17:29:55 · answer #10 · answered by stell0603 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋