and that on the one (observable) end of the spectrum there are the laws of physics and the most basic element,hydrogen, and on the other end of things, there are the laws of physics, and elements that are only limited in their complexity by the amount of energy that is available to form them.
2007-02-25 09:03:21 · 4 answers · asked by ferd1233445 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Well, I would say that your statement is more or less correct. I am a bit confused by your phrase about "on
one end of the spectrum." Yes, the mass that is here has always been here. Yes, the simplest forms of matter begin on the atomic chart with hydrogen and proceed
upwards to more complex examples of matter with more protons and electrons and neutrons. Indeed, some forms of matter we may only suppose at this time due to their atomic nature and complexity.
In the universe there are vast amounts of energy held within stars and many unknown things may be happening within the furnaces inside those stars. The restrictions of time and distance (and massive heat/radiation) will most likely keep those secrets hidden for a long, long time.
2007-02-25 09:38:33 · answer #1 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is it fair to say that we can see into the past and the future simultaneously as if we have the ability to do so? I don't think so.
I think that we have the ability to take life as we know it, and using the knowledge that we have, "postulate" on beginnings and outcomes. But, I do not think it fair to say, that we can ever have a definitive answer to the questions of the origin of the universe or its ultimate destination.
We are but a blip on the radar of time . . . and time is one of those concepts we invented to keep track of ourselves . . . the universe probably doesn't even know what "time" is.
2007-02-25 09:12:03 · answer #2 · answered by CAROL P 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is fair to say but only on the basis that space itself is not subject to evolutionary changes how ever space may be thought of as a vacum or void it is still only a medium like air or water through wich the speed of light is regulated that being the case it has properties we may not be able to detect that the modification of could have an inter dimensional effect. this means that space is somthing and not nothing.
2007-02-25 10:12:23 · answer #3 · answered by Tony N 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We really have no idea whether everything "has always been"
2007-02-25 09:54:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋