Why do conservatives insist Iraq was blocking WMD inspections, when Hans Blix said Iraq was cooperating?

Question

Here is his UN testimony 2 weeks before Bush attacked Iraq:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/07/sprj.irq.un.transcript.blix/index.html

Note it says:

"Inspections in Iraq resumed on the 27th of November 2002. In matters relating to process, notably prompt access to sites, we have faced relatively few difficulties, and certainly much less than those that were faced by UNSCOM [U.N. Special Commission] in the period 1991 to 1998."

ruth, your revisionism is ill-considered. Not everybody voted to go, and Americans have the right to understand why wars are being waged in their name and with their money.

nextJFK - do you have any comment on Blix's statement, or not?

Tom, Hans was right about WMD and Bush was wrong. So who's the idiot?

Answer 1

Americans are really misinformed for the most part. If you do not believe this just ask a question about Canadian health care, you will get two differnent versions one from the conservatives and one from Canadians. Maybe Brain washed is a better word then being misinformed. Rush, Shawn and Ann all play a contributing part in this and then they get their news from faux news, not exactly the best news source.

Answer 2

You are going to believe what you choose to believe. Particularly if you can twist it to attack Bush.

If you ever decide to seriously look into the matter, please, do some research.

The fact that Saddam was thwarting and preventing adequate inspections is an historical fact, supported by some 17 or 18 U.N. Resolutions and significant U.N. Sanctions.

But, as I said at the outset, you are going to believe what you choose to believe and I know that you aren't going to let the facts get in the way.

Answer 3

Why does this even matter anymore? The liberals who are locked in the initiating of the war in Iraq are failing to keep pace with the situation currently.

If we leave Iraq now, wide open to Iran and Hezbollah, we will be choosing WWIII.

As far as the initial invasion, everybody voted to go, and people really need to accept that and face the current situation.

Answer 4

The line from the Administration and here's why:

Hermann Goering, Hitler’s Propaganda Minister said; “Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger”.

Do you think it might have been propagana?

Answer 5

I consider the different posters, undertaking is achieved. Saddam Hussein is removed from skill. besides the fact that it might have been super to locate the WMDs to break them, a minimum of we achieved what we got down to do. it variety of feels like the sadistic evil dictator fans (Saddam) are going "nuts" with the thumbs down over some straight forward straight forward data that they are going to by no skill ever, EVER admit to as properly, what do you think of?

Answer 6

i think everything about terrorism is just a story that was made up by the goverment, the iraq war is on oil, bush is an assasin of inocent people, and all his supporters are neonazis

Answer 7

Hans said that there were impediments to his investigators, but not as many as there were during the Clinton Administration. I listened to him giving the report. Hans was and is an idiot.

Answer 8

Where you in the rain forest when that "inspection" was going on? The blocked old Hans at every gate.

Answer 9

according to george bush, hans blix does not know how to tie his own shoes.

Answer 10

Come on, stop it. Those who care will care and those who don't won't. We have the war regardless of how it happened so we have to deal with it. It would be nice to do it as a united country.