Would the U.S.A. be better off without political parties -to eliminate partisan politics?

Question

I think that without parties it would help to eliminate partisan politics. I am sick of politicians who support or condemn others due to their political affiliation.

I realize without parties there would be no caucuses to narrow the field down to a reasonable number of candidates on a ballot, but I'm sure it could be made to work.

Answer 1

I vote by candidate, already. Yes, I think it would be fine to eliminate parties. However, currently that is how elections are funded, so it would take a while.

Answer 2

I couldn't agree more. I have an idea of using cellphones so that everyone that has one can directly participate in their government. This would eliminate partisan politics by implementing a pure democracy. It hasn't really taken off though...too bad.

Answer 3

besides the fact that I oftentimes whinge approximately partisan politics, i don't think of that the events themselves are the actual subject. We in basic terms have too few options, and regrettably modern-day elections have scared human beings removed from vote casting for "0.33" events. according to danger with extra events, we could start to cut back the commercialization of the political technique. Election conflict chests are risky impediments to an open democracy. So is the demonization of the competition this is lots too basic in a 2-party device. Politicians could be pressured to communicate the subject concerns in an psychological trend, not in basic terms count on heavily built stereotypes on the subject of the "others." those political assaults are additionally damaging our way of existence and national cohesion with the perceived pink State/Blue State divide. in the previous I completely grasped the reality of yank politics, i replace into particularly idealistic and argued that we could continuously % each and each candidate consistent along with his/her own advantages. whether, now I comprehend the urge to vote alongside party traces; i in basic terms can not carry myself to vote Republican using extra advantageous implications for our government. To me, Democrats are the lesser evil. yet think of if we had countless events in a device that extra appropriately pondered the variety of yank political ideals. would we proceed to settle for the compromises that are often needed to vote under the present 2-party shape, or would we certainly end to contemplate what each and each party can provide? superb now, you're certainly pressured to conform with the GOP's religious/professional-organization/anti-gun administration/anti-abortion time table or the Democrat's secular/professional-immigration/professional-gun administration/professional-determination platform (no custom orders!). For a rustic that loves options, we are oddly limited in finding out how our government could function.

Answer 4

Moot question. Every democracy I know of has at least 2 viable political parties. They are inevitable.

Answer 5

That's a big yes.