Why do some Americans say that their own government planned 9/11?

Question

I don't understand why there are so many Americans that believe that 9/11 was a work of the US government and President Bush. There is no reason why the US government would want to attack their own country and kill their own citizens. Some people say that the planes were actually US government planes, and a lot of people say that the Pentagon was hit by a missile.

If that's true ... what happened to all those people that were on the planes? People lost their fathers, and mothers and wifes and husbands, brothers and sisters on those flights, and I think it's awful for people to say that there was no one on the planes.

So many Americans ask questions about that, and give answers and they actually belive it. I am not from the US, I am from Canada and I don't understand why some Americans would want to believe such a thing if they claim to love their country?

Answer 1

Because some people are idiots.

The people who think George W did it are also the ones who think he's an idiot. Now think about that. How can you be an idiot and pull of the biggest government cover up in human history? It's hard enough to break into a hotel room without getting caught.

People these days cannot keep secrets at all. They love telling everybody they can, including telling the media. Now If this was an inside job, it would have taken a lot of people to carry it out. How is it that nobody has leaked the secret?

There are so many flaws to the conspiracies. Some people are just anti-Bush, and some people are just anti-government. Both groups of people are responsible for the birth and continued life of these stupid conspiracy theories.

stephenmwells -- I don't know where you got you figures, but your "80% of Americans..." figure is very incorrect. I'm sure that in CA it is 80% or more, but not in the rest of the country. I'm sure it is less than a quarter who believe in conspiracy theories, but definitely less than half.

Answer 2

Thank you for the question and it is great you are not from the US to ask that question. I don't know why people feel the need to spout off that our government was to blame for 9/11 but my own thoughts are that they have such a deep hatred for the current administration that they want and need to make up these theories to justify that hatred, when it really should be categorized as them being poor losers from the last presidential elections. Thank you Canada for being such a steadfast friend to the American people. I do hope our relationship with your country and ours continues to be one of mutual respect and admiration for each other regardless of the differences between our leadership.

Answer 3

At last, a theory that actually makes sense. The large majority of the US citizens do not believe that our government was responsible for the attacks..

Answer 4

The 9/11 commission report is flawed and their findings are incorrect. Also they discount scientific fact and physics. No mention of WTC 7 in the report either. The facts are there to be found if you curiosity is strong you will see why over 80% of Americans feel something is wrong with the offical story on so many points. Only fear keeps people from the truth. I see a lot of scared people here.

Answer 5

They're just mad Al Gore didn't win in 2000. No one in their right mind really believes such crap! It's kinda like Global warming - the liberals gotta make something up so they can get elected. Desperate people will do desperate things!

Answer 6

People who think this is true are making their decisions based on theory and not on fact-which I find true in many of these type of questions. Educate yourself before you make yourself look foolish. (not you-everyone)

Answer 7

The current so called leader of our country is too stupid to plan anything that elaborate. However, I wouldn't put it past his advisors.

Answer 8

Just because a person loves their county, does not mean they should have to put up with continued abuse from their government. If you loved your spouse and found pictures of them with other partners, would you keep quite, even if its happened before? They say love is blind, but I don't think it has to be stupid.

For over forty years, our government has been nothing short of puppets for the super rich multinational companies. With their money and power over the media, they have been able to place whomever they chose as our national leaders. Then they destroy our environment and with it our lives for their economic gain. When we the people manage to get someone in that promise to safeguard us from these companies, our candidate get shot and killed. And the worse thing is thugs like the Bush family, who seem to always have a hand in it, never get prosecuted. How much of this do we have to take before we can yell, " STOP KILLING US YOU REPTILIAN BASTARDS". This last time (9/11), they got away with 3,000 people and the number keeps climbing as those NeoCon thugs pursue control over that Iraqi oil.

I'm not just blowing smoke at you, take a look at all the incriminating evidence they left for us to find; Both at the WTC buildings and the Pentagon. If they are going to kill us, the least they should do is do it right: We don't need salt rubbed in our wounds.

____________________________________________

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), started planning the invasion of Iraq, even before Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is the one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 9

that's a theory sure I do t think of yet once you fold the 5$ invoice in a undeniable way you will see the twin towers and in case you fold the 50$ invoice,i think of, you will see the towers smoking

Answer 10

watch 'in plane sight" on google video