2007-02-25 07:54:18 · 7 answers · asked by aiminhigh24u2 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Unfortunately the bleeding heart cool-aide drinking liberals, including those who have provided their deluded answers to this question, will only realize they're wrong after this country has done another Viet Nam pull-out. Iran will stroll in and control one-third of Iraq. They will proceed to annihilate all Sunnis. Saudi-Arabia and the other Sunni countries will not like that and step in to help those Iraqi Sunnis. Things would then escalate and spiral even more out of control. It would be such a disaster that even the cool-aide drinkers would become sober enough to realized Bush was correct. They would finally understand what he was doing was keeping the fight raging over there but because the U.S. left Iraq, like in Viet Nam, the evil forces had become victorious. Iran had been able to build it's atomic bomb and Israel disappeared in a five second white flash. The radiation cloud had become expanded over Europe and towards North America. Many Americans would soon die because the bleeding heart liberals had hated President Bush so much they wanted this country to lose. The world as the cool-aide drinkers once knew it would never return.
2007-02-25 08:29:59 · answer #1 · answered by cartiphilus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Qaedas strategy? To kill American soldiers. Lets face it, Al Qaeda has really already defeated the Bush admin. in so many ways, it doesn't matter anymore. I thought we destroyed these guys when we attacked Afghanastan? Maybe not.
2007-02-25 16:01:39 · answer #2 · answered by go 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who are you referring to, the coalition of the willing? Great Britain?
Per globalsecurity.org
Countries which had troops in or supported operations in Iraq at one point but have pulled out since: Nicaragua (Feb. 2004); Spain (late-Apr. 2004); Dominican Republic (early-May 2004); Honduras (late-May 2004); Philippines (~Jul. 19, 2004); Thailand (late-Aug. 2004); New Zealand (late Sep. 2004); Tonga (mid-Dec. 2004) Portugal (mid-Feb. 2005); The Netherlands (Mar. 2005); Hungary (Mar. 2005); Singapore (Mar. 2005); Norway (Oct. 2005); Ukraine (Dec. 2005); Japan (July 17, 2006); Italy (Nov. 2006); Slovakia (Jan 2007).
Countries planning to withdraw from Iraq: Poland had earlier claimed that it would withdraw all soldiers by the end of 2006. It however extended the mandate of its contingent through at least mid-2007. Denmark announced that it would withdraw its troop contingent by August 2007.
Countries which have recently reduced or are planning to reduce their troop commitment: South Korea is planning to withdraw up to 1000 soldiers by the end of 2006. Poland withdrew 700 soldiers in Feb. 2005. Between May 2005 and May 2006, the United Kingdom reduced the size of its contingent by 1,300. The United Kingdom also is planning to reduce significantly the size of its contingent by the end of 2007, with an initial reduction of 1,600 troops followed by an additional 500 troops by end of 2007.
2007-02-25 15:57:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cut and run? what does that mean, your Bush is sending more troops over there As we speak, so who pray tell is running? I wish what you say was true, then are people could come home.
There is not 100 Iraqi's worth 1 of are men and women and I should not have to tell you that.
2007-02-25 16:05:00 · answer #4 · answered by sandyjean 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cut and run crowd? i wasn't aware the reagan repubs still existed enough to matter.
2007-02-25 16:03:07 · answer #5 · answered by J Q Public 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well you could sign up for the Army, they're crying out for people like you. Cannon fodder!
2007-02-25 15:57:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It was there plan all a long
2007-02-25 15:58:22 · answer #7 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋