Al Gore made a call to Bush late the night of the election and conceded. Why did he do that? Because he lost. His handlers must have put it in his head we can steal this election if we are shrewd. Al called back Bush to take back his concession.
The flip flops we have come to see as so common with the Democrats
Bush won the first count in Florida. He won the second count. The Dems then want to count only in a heavily favored Democrat county. Who now is trying to steal this election? I remember Senator Alan Simpson saying, if you hold up the voting card, (with the chads) put it up against the bright lights and interrogate it, "it will confess."
Does anyone remember how the people in St. Louis Mo. were allowed to keep voting 2 hours after the election. John Ashcroft was considering contesting that Senate seat. Bush asked him to be his attorney general.
2007-02-25 07:20:08 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It is all part of a rewrite of history designed to make Bush illegitimate. All things considered it seemed almost impossible for Gore to have lost. Consider, the economy was roaring, Clinton left office extremely popular, Gore had high approval ratings as a VP. It is easy to see how people might think there was something afoot in FL. However the truth is Bush won FL, every recount shows that. Gore's attempt to steal the 2000 election was reminiscent of the tactics used in banana republics to keep the ruling party in power and thankfully the US supreme court wasn't buying it
2007-02-25 07:37:15 · answer #1 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Liberals have confidence they're entitled to skill. they have been out of skill for a mutually as. they have confidence they're the ruling type and something anybody is stupid. They had to recount 3 heavily Democratic districts in FL. Is that truthful? Why not count extensive sort the completed state? Democrats say that Republicans thieve elections. How on the subject of the WA governor's race? Republican Dino Rossi gained 2 counts and lost the 0.33, whilst some lacking Seattle votes have been got here across. the difficulty is there have been extra votes solid than registered voters. How on the subject of the reality that many Democrats refuse to help requiring image identity to vote? They comprehend that they can't thieve elections with the identity standards. Or how approximately that a super sort of the districts that the Democrats call fraudulent are run by skill of Democrats. a super sort of the internal cities are run by skill of Democrats. the place there's a sufferer and a meant incorrect, there's a Democrat declaring that there should be extra government intervention.
2016-10-16 11:31:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrat Mayor Daily (Senior) of Chicago wanted people to vote early and vote often for the Democrat party. The Democrats invented voter fraud. Lyndon Johnson won his first race for Congress when the dead awoke, left the grave yards and voted for him. He was called "Landslide Lyndon" for his amazing win. The polls in Chicago were kept open long enough to ensure that Kennedy carried the state (down state was for Nixon). Remember Boss Tweed and how he manipulated New York politics to keep his Democrat machine in power.
2007-02-25 08:08:06 · answer #3 · answered by Mr Wisdom 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That still doesn't explain the felon list problem where 90,000 people legit voters were stopped from voting because there was a felon in the state with the same name. The main demographic of the people denied are black. Blacks of course are typically democrat in florida.
All other arguments aside, the above situation makes in obvious that republicans didn't run a fair election in florida that year.
2007-02-25 09:35:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your memory of the election is self serving and inaccurate. The re-counts showed more votes going to Gore, the chads, the inability of certain Democratic precincts to vote ( fewer voting machines and some didn't work ), that all the votes were NEVER counted ( absentee ) and the Supreme Court Justice Scalia ordered the third recount to stop - so no, w did not win it "fair and square" - by the way, aren't you supposed to be in Iraq fighting your man's war instead of still blabbering your incorrect understanding of history? If all the w supporters were letting their actions speak as loud as their words, they would be enlisting r already in Iraq - what is your excuse for not going?
2007-02-25 07:39:12 · answer #5 · answered by commonsense 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Just remember that Bush lost the popular vote, the one that should count.
2007-02-25 08:20:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
ask bush what happened to 40,000 votes that was lost and no one was able to find them. bush stole the election in 2000.
2007-02-25 13:15:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because they are poor sports and can't handle the fact that they lost fairly and that the American people in general are conservative and are not ready for the liberals, that would be a blow to their ego
2007-02-25 08:08:45 · answer #8 · answered by Wildroze 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because it's SO much easier than admitting the truth, that truth being that they lost the election fair and square. A close run, but they still lost.
2007-02-25 07:28:12 · answer #9 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Plus the fact that Gore cherry picked the counties to be recounted (and he still LOST) and not all of the absentee ballots were even in...
2007-02-25 07:26:05 · answer #10 · answered by i_love_my_mp 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋