why is everyone sayin batista is 1-0 at wm...beacuse he has beatin hhh and he beat the rock nd mick foley with ric flair and randy orton at wm so he is 2-0
2007-02-25 06:54:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Maybee people mean that he is 1-0 in singles competition. If you count tag matches hes 2-0.
Also let me say this all these wrestlers talk about how there undefeated at wm. (Who cares.) undertaker, edge, batista. Is that supposed to mean something. It means nothing to me. Hey go ahead and count goldberg in there he was in one wm against brock and he beat him. goldberg undefeated at wm. yeahhh woohoooo. lol Hey guys also mr t wrestled at one wm and he is also undefeated I wonder if he will ever loose. lol Its just another marketing gimmick to get people to watch. So many people actually care about an old undertaker v a completley over rated batista because hes undefeated at wm. lol This is just my opinion any agree with that.
Michael
2007-02-25 07:25:08 · answer #1 · answered by mike c 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ur right batista is 2-0 for now but after this mania its going to be 2-1. rip batista
2007-02-25 08:13:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know he is 2-0 not 1-0. Man sometimes people can be so stupid.
2007-02-25 06:58:19 · answer #3 · answered by julie c~actress and WWE&TNA_FAN! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't give a damn about Batista. He's over rated.
2007-02-25 07:04:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's whatever Vince McMahon decides it is!
2007-02-25 06:59:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋