EVERYTHING BUSH DOES GOES TO CRAP!!
2007-02-25 06:44:35 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
His "failures" have been keeping liberals safe to complain about everything he does .
2007-02-25 06:55:24 · answer #1 · answered by sam simeon 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, the 17 percenters will always look upon the man as a failure, no matter how bad of a failure he is, no matter how long it takes for the world to clean up the mess, or who else acknowledges the man is a failure.
2007-02-25 07:18:34 · answer #2 · answered by some_guy_times_50 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you basing that statement on. The only thing he sucks at is his lack of public speaking skills. As far as what he has accomplished, a good growing economy, more jobs, support for the war effort, higher GDP, as well as many other things are under his belt. He accomplished more on paper than Clinton did (not saying that it takes a lot to do that). I understand you dont like him because he sounds like a monkey when he talks but if you look at the actual numbers he hasnt been much of a failure at all. The war situation is debatable but if you were president and someone crashed planes into your skyscrapers, pentagon and attemped to do so also with your whitehouse, how would you handle it?
2007-02-25 06:54:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
That's probably gonna happen right after Dems admit Clinton was a failure.
2007-02-25 06:50:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
You are wrong. I think that your hatred of Bush is clouding your judgement.
2007-02-25 07:10:45 · answer #5 · answered by c1523456 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
agreed...and Clinton was far from a failure...."shy_angel" check your facts, he may have been a failure morally(none of our business if its not threatening national security)but he was a very good president.
2007-02-25 06:55:48 · answer #6 · answered by Paulien 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
well, thank god for him, he seems like he's the only one in the world willing to act on what the rest of the world is too chicken to do (except for our wonderful allies and coalition, of course).
2007-02-25 06:51:17 · answer #7 · answered by alex l 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
That would erode the delusion and they would be left with reality. That's asking too much. Much easier to bury their heads in the sand.
2007-02-25 06:52:24 · answer #8 · answered by guy o 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
define "repgs". no, we will not.
2007-02-25 07:20:32 · answer #9 · answered by patriot07 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
when did he do you????
2007-02-25 06:51:32 · answer #10 · answered by 007 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋