2007-02-25 06:34:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My son is gay ,he got married last year in June it was a fantastic wedding everyone had a good time my son in law is great ,he calls me his gorgeous mum in law .I really don't have a problem with it. Live and let live I say.
2007-02-25 06:46:11 · answer #1 · answered by ǝuoʎʞɔɐʍ 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
100% for it.
if a group of people is forbidden to marry it is discrimination. it is unamerican
all of the reason against gay marriage have no merit. religon has nothing to do with law, the APA said no sexual orientation is healthier than another, people were worried in '78 when interracial marriage was legalized and we've been fine for almost 30 years, ect
2007-02-25 15:13:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
everyone should be free to do whatever they want, but dont try and tell me its normal or correct, i think about it this way in evolution > they cannot procreate therefore the people that are gay would naturally not be replaced by thier own children and nature would not allow their genes to carry on.
2007-02-25 15:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by fast eddie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The wedding plans will probably be top notch and very fashionable. Probably a great party too.
2007-02-25 14:39:17 · answer #4 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i don't even know why this is an issue in the U.S., it's ridiculous, the constitution clearly states that we cannot discriminate in any way because of sexual orientation....
let them get married, i don't care..as long as their not making out in public let them do whatever they want...i feel the same way about straight couples...
this is a RELIGIOUS battle, NOT a political battle.....separation of church and state people.
2007-02-25 15:11:41 · answer #5 · answered by Paulien 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't see any reason why two consenting adults cannot enter into whatever contracts are mutually desirable to them.
I also don't see how it's anyone else's business what they decide to call said contract, as long as it is legally binding and enforceable.
2007-02-25 14:46:10 · answer #6 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I have no problem with it. I also don't see why people want to stop them from getting married.
Homosexuals are humans like all of us and I think that depriving them of rights (such as the right to get married) is an assault on what I feel are essential human rights.
2007-02-25 14:40:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
My position is this. They say they are deprived of their rights of being able to get married. That is a damned lie. They have the same right to get married as I do. They just want ADDITIONAL rights to get married to the SAME SEX. That should NOT be allowed. They have the right to a civil union. In the past, they have all gobbled the goo without a marriage license. Why do they want it changed now? It is the all mighty dollar factor.
2007-02-25 14:49:43 · answer #8 · answered by just the facts 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
It opens a NEVER ending Box. If Gays are allowed to marry Whats next? One guy and 20 girls? Mother and son? Father and daughter? If we are not allowed to stop gay marriage simply becfause they LOVE each other How then can ANY be denied? I do believe there should be civil unions however. I've hears stories of couples that have been together for years being denied access to hospital rooms because they weren't considered family ect. Civil Unions YES. Gay marriage No. Just my opinion.
2007-02-25 14:43:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
I'm for it. I wish more men were gay so I could have a better chance with women.
2007-02-25 14:43:08 · answer #10 · answered by J 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋