2007-02-25 06:24:51 · 8 answers · asked by journeyofman2000 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe we could just agree to disagree. A mutual respect of power and the willingness to harbor peace.
2007-02-25 06:27:37 · answer #1 · answered by dolphinparty13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not necessarily, though that is how it happens alot. Look at WWII, 1939, Germany invades Poland without any diplomacy involved accept the complete and total surrender of Poland. This is an example of outright war.
2007-02-25 06:30:48 · answer #2 · answered by Chase 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Usually, but not always. In the 80's, at the height of the Cold War, there was something called Mutually Assured Destruction, which was a more powerful deterrent than anything else out there.
Sometimes, even when there are still diplomatic solutions, this gung-ho right-wing president will take us to war.
2007-02-25 06:31:32 · answer #3 · answered by thebobcatreturns 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
diplomacy will not end, but war is necessary when time is right! Can you talk when the other side want you to yield but they not? You must beat them first in order to compromise in that case!
2007-02-25 06:40:16 · answer #4 · answered by holyfire 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the lives of my family and friends are at stake and I have reached the end of diplomacy, then yes, it means war.
2007-02-25 06:28:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Depends on the circumstances going onto the process. Korea has tachnically been at war since the cease fore, but there have been few hostilities since then. We have pulled diplomats from certain countries. It just means that we refuse to deal with their government.
2007-02-25 06:29:18 · answer #6 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends! You haven't given enough info in your question1!!!!
2007-02-25 06:29:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dunno, but the war does mean the end of diplomacy.
2007-02-25 06:31:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋