Who is the bigger threat, ultraliberal defeatist Barack Hussein Obama or ultraliberal Hillary Rodham-Clinton?

Answer 1

Actually, Clinton is a centrist. Threat, how so? Please elaborate. Our are you just blowing air out of your rear?

Hillary Clinton’s chances:
http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2007/01/21/sen-clinton-ahead-in-democratic-race-poll/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftoday.reuters.com%2Fnews%2Farticlenews.aspx%3Ftype%3DtopNews%26storyid%3D2007-01-21T160400Z_01_N21442189_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-POLITICS-POLL.xml%26src%3Drss%26rpc%3D22&frame=true

Hillary’s accomplishments:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200610u/green-interview
Video:
http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/02/hillary_clinton.php

Answer 2

I know the guy who asked this question. He is a Stanford educated attorney. More importantly, he and his family are the most generous, giving people I know. I imagine the threat he is talking about is socialized health care, caving to the terrorists, and hiking our taxes. Those are threats to every hard-working American. If you do not see this... OPEN YOUR EYES. Socialized medicine is a disaster. I pay my medical bills out-of-pocket as I do not have insurance. I do not like the expense, but I will gladly pay to get the QUALITY medical care I need when I NEED IT! Taxes are bad for everyone, from the richest to the poorest. If you don't get that, you shouldn't vote. First and foremost, if we don't take the fight to the terrorists' backyard, we will end up fighting here in America. My children will be in peril because these two just don't get it. FYI, both Hillary and Barack Hussein are uberliberal. Hillary has changed her positions in an attempt to get elected because a "centrist" is more appealing to the masses. Deep down, she is a liberal (remember Hillarycare?!). Barack Hussein is just downright scary. He is nothing but a career politician who is out of touch with reality. Out of the two, Hillary is less of a threat because her ambition forces her to move closer to the middle.

Answer 3

I never vote for the party, I choose the person. I did not vote for Clinton. I believe Hillary would have made a better president. She really tried to fix healthcare, everything she tried she was shot down. They thought she was a fool. New York did not think she was a fool, she was a shoo in. She played ignorant regarding Bill's private activities, which was smart. Can you imagine how the press would have had a double field day. If she had smacked the dickens out of him and left? Her career would have been over. No, I don't think that SHE is the threat.

Answer 4

Interesting labels (a.k.a. name calling). Why are Clinton and Obama "ultra-liberal"? And why is Obama labeled a defeatist? Nearly all the Presidential contenders from both parties want to get our troops out of Iraq, the only difference between Obama and rest of the field is that has put a time table together as opposed to just saying "till the job's done" or "as soon as possible".

Answer 5

Clinton. Obama has too many things going against him in this election. he's a minority (according to danger in basic terms a million/2, yet he would not look like it). He has a Muslim call. The Republican smear gadget has already attacked him along with his meant "Muslim terrorist training." He additionally does not comprehend the thank you to strike returned whilst the smear gets extremely heavy come September of 2008. Clinton has in basic terms some issues going against her. She is a female and her call is Clinton. She maximum veritably count extensive sort out the south different than according to danger Florida. she will even have a not basic time with the Midwest. yet there are various in this u . s . a . who will keep in mind the monetary advance and time of peace that this u . s . a . had whilst invoice replace into in place of work.

Answer 6

oh dear. so depressing.
i wish there was a better country to live for those eight years...(yes, i know i'm a pessimist. i still hope for the best though.)
maybe people will realize how socialist they both are and that socialism is NOT a good thing. wouldn't that be great.

sidenote. i understand everyone has a right to their own opinion. and i don't hate either of them. (in fact, i think they are both quite intelligent.) i just completely disagree/oppose pretty much everything both of them stand for. and no, i don't agree with president bush on everything, or even most things.

Answer 7

The greatest threat to America is people who cannot see that the distance from the perceived "far-right" to the perceived "far-left" in the USA amounts to nothing in the global political scheme of things. It is precisely these type of people that allowed McCarthyism to occur. Get a grip! If you disagree with stated policies of the Democrats, say so, but never forget that that the greatest freedom you have as an American is to make a chump of yourself, and no-one can stop you.

You would do better to fear someone who governs by decree (so-called "signing statements") than someone who wants to use your tax dollars to pander to the widest possible audience.

Answer 8

The bigger threat for what? The bigger threat to the tenuous grasp Dubya has on reality? I wish the 2008 election would happen tomorrow!

Answer 9

Wow. A little narrow-minded, aren't we???

I think one should hear all of the issues at hand and then decide. Deciding simply due to a label is politically irresponsible, not to mention rather stupid (I point to the current guy in office. . .).

Do you really vote???? I am hoping not.

Answer 10

From my perspective they are both a major threat--to the Republicans. You better gather your flock and get on the stick before we tax you to death.

Answer 11

Biggest threat = Quick-to-label-guy YOU.