I think it is murder and anyone who is for it is a murderer!
2007-02-25 05:56:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Under certain circumstances, an abortion should be granted ~ It should not be used as a means of birth control, which it is ~ and after a certain period of time, no abortion should be given ~ If some of the pro-choice people actually viewed an abortion on a fetus, they MIGHT just think differently ~ Women go out, have sex with who knows who, use no protection, then have an abortion and go out and do it all over again ~ An acquaintance once worked in a clinic ( and finally had to quit because she could no longer watch these fetus's being torn apart limb by limb) and told me they had "regulars" who frequented the place for an abortion with no remorse at all ~ basically it was their means of birth control~
2007-02-25 14:42:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by 2179 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
How ironic that many of the rights you have today were brought to you by feminists-like your right to vote. Maybe you should stop voting since the women that brought you that right were undoubtedly feminists!
On abortion, the same people who don't want to pay for entitlements are against abortion. What do those women do when they find themselves pregnant. You don't think the government should help, employers are allowed to fire pregnant women(more than ever). Why don't people want to help them?
2007-02-25 13:56:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Nobody is actually for abortion, people are in favor of the right to choose.
I too am pro choice, I have heard all the rhetoric about innocent life. I have studies human anatomy and physiology for conception to death. I know what a fetus looks like and how is can resemble a baby. All that aside.
Society is full of unwanted children. A large portion of my pay goes to social programs that house, feed, give heath care coverage, schooling said children. The protective system is bogged down with children born to parents that cannot care for them. For some all they have known is a life of desperation and pain. Why should we make the situation worse by adding more children to an already broken system
2007-02-25 14:08:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by smedrik 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
I favor the right of a woman to have an abortion. However, Roe v Wade should be repealed. Let's make it a state by state question. Let's get rid of the federal law and let the states decide as they choose. Reason: Tired of talking about it in national elections.
2007-02-25 14:01:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by edcyhn 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I believe in the right to choose. It may not be your view, but let others decide to do what they want with their bodies. We need less moral police not more.
I do however believe that you should not have an abortion as a form of birth control. If it's not done in the first 20 weeks too bad, now your having a kid.
2007-02-25 13:58:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by apple juice 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
I am against it, but it should stay safe and legal. If we make it illegal women will still get abortions. More unwanted children will be brought into the world, poverty will increase, we will have to increase welfare because you know all these women are not going to give their babies up for adoption. Did you know a feminist is for equal rights for men and women? Why are you against that?
2007-02-25 13:55:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by J 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
i am pro-abortion in circumstances such as rape, extreme deformities, mental retardation.
But when a child is going to be born healthy it deserves a good life and no one has the right to take it away, it should be given for adoption, there are so many people that cant have kids and would die for one.
Hillary is such a hypocrite, she is a feminist and she got cheated on and stayed with her husband. How stupid, she lacks a soul. she stayed with her husband for political ambition.
Im voting Obama
2007-02-25 13:52:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by JoseMaria G 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
Liberals like Hillary want drive-thru abortions paid for by your tax dollars. If you value LIFE and liberty then you must not vote for Hillary.
2007-02-25 13:55:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by x 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
It's legalized first degree murder.
When you go back and look at how the libs on the Supreme court took away the states right to decide for something they said was implied in the constitution but not really even in there. I hope it makes those of you who look as sick as it does me.
Rudy G. has atleast pledged to appoint people to the supreme court who don't find it necessary to make things up so they can steal state's rights. If it comes down to him or some lib that would strangle a baby with their own hands I'm going with Rudy G.
2007-02-25 13:54:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by archangel72901 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
as long as it is before three months(the time when the fetus is not conscious and doesn't have a nervous system)i believe in the pro-choice side(it's NOT PRO-DEATH)....it is a women's right to choose what happens to her body, the baby is part of her body....
for those of you that say it is unconstitutional i say this, the laws set forth said the rights start at BIRTH...so it really depends on your definition of birth.
for those of you ignorant and inexperienced enough to say "you're a guy you have no right to say jack about this!" think again, i have personal experience to back it up, it's just as much our baby as it is yours...so don't judge.
2007-02-25 14:00:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Paulien 5
·
3⤊
2⤋