2007-02-25 05:30:20 · 33 answers · asked by steve738494 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Yes, without a doubt! In fact, i think we'd be better off if him, hammond and James May were running the country.
2007-02-25 12:30:29 · answer #1 · answered by mallybb298 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Clarkson is a buffoon. I agree. He could in no way be entered right into a contending electoral celebration as he's basically too debatable and he's largely a journalist; albeit very powerful. From what i be attentive to of clarkson, via utilising the media (acceptable kit/interview and so on..), his rules could render this united states uncivilised and risky (e.g. 'uping the linked fee shrink to 150mph and everybody who falls short gets a bullet interior the path of the top courtesy of a few police marksman' (OWTTA). notwithstanding, you have have been given to bear in mind that the guy appeals to the mass objective marketplace. people pay attention to him, admire him and relate to him. he's the different of this cutting-area politically acceptable suited stance and political bollocks. He does talk the recommendations of thousands and thousands and is no longer scared to realize this. He loves his united states, he loves what England has performed for the international and he's relatively passionate. he's robust minded, intellegent and point headed; this, coupled to a reformed stance on usa and a few tweeks in rules and public character.... nicely you in no way be attentive to. Clarkson, if he could ever evaluate it, could acutally make a good PM he basically needs tidying up somewhat. look via his 'acceptable kit' banter, its basically for good leisure. concerning to the secure practices ingredient in automobiles you reported. that's ecu legislations, the PM has no longer something to do with that. He could in no way do away with the secure practices components of automobiles he would be over ridden. The solicitors could be on his back if he abolished 'well-being and secure practices' as nicely. The sheep remark; i do no longer think of he brainwashes people, he basically induces a feeling of realism into the equation particularly than this media rubbish you pay attention. e.g he as quickly as reported 'velocity in no way killed everybody, its the linked fee at which you adjust into table sure is what kills you.' he's ideal. learn Newton 2nd regulation.
2016-10-01 23:19:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I like his blokish, rebellious, anti feminist, anti metro-sexual anti global warming, anti car commissars mindset. It's very refreshing and reminds me of the way things used to be before those unpatriotic lefties took over. I cringe at the thought of those anti-smoking cocoa drinking nannies.
2007-02-26 04:02:48 · answer #3 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a delicious idea. Jeremy and Boris as a dream ticket.
2007-02-25 08:22:55 · answer #4 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
But what about that annoying heavy tone to his voice as he gets deeper as the point he has made.
example:
And if they dont get it ready for 5pm THEY GO OUT OF BUSINESS
Can you image him at home "Can you please pass the sugar" SO I CAN SWEETEN MY TEA !
Prime Minister NO not at all not ever, hes to honest, got to be bent to be PM.
2007-02-25 23:11:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jeremy Clarkson, no. Boris Johnson, yes, yes, yes!
2007-02-25 05:40:22 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No,who will present Top Gear? vote for Boris instead
2007-02-25 05:38:51 · answer #7 · answered by QPRfan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I Think he should be made the "Emperor" Of Europe -- so long as he Vows to "Shoot on Sight" all the "Politically Correct" Lunatics , which are Destroying Our World ...
2007-02-25 22:43:16 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be nice to have a pro-car government! I used to enjoy driving before this government did everything they could to make it as miserable and expensive as possible.
2007-02-25 22:19:00 · answer #9 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Love his ideas
2007-02-25 05:32:52 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋