English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you agree with size 0 models? just curious.

2007-02-25 04:23:13 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style Other - Beauty & Style

4 answers

if they are 'naturally' a zero then yes, if they're starving themselves to 'maintain' a zero - NO WAY!!!!!!!!!

2007-02-25 04:30:24 · answer #1 · answered by thenakats 4 · 1 0

length 0 is in basic terms ok while you're patently geared up that way and not underweight. i've got continuously stated human beings will not be able to help the way they're geared up, yet whilst human beings tension themselves right down to an unnaturally small length, it is not healthy and dangerous. i'm in basic terms 5ft2, yet i'd nonetheless could weigh 90lb-100lb max to be a real length 0, so as this is extremely risky for me. whether, there would be somebody else my top with very small bone shape and is a length 0 because of the fact they're of course very petite and nonetheless be healthy. And as quickly as I say length 0, I recommend measurements 31-23-33 as i comprehend a super sort of people think of they seem to be a length 0, and it is extremely in basic terms arrogance sizing and that they are extra like a real length 2 or 4, that's high-quality. HTH : )

2016-10-16 11:16:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, but their should also be models of all sizes. Size zero is not natural for everyone.

2007-02-25 04:32:25 · answer #3 · answered by Bridget d 2 · 0 0

Not really because some people are naturally made that way so I don't really care about appearances. I mean if they're healthy looking then OK. But if they look like they're about to pass out then they shouldn't be on the runway!!!

2007-02-25 04:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by lalamc1 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers