English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Surender is shamefull. Wanting to win is never shamefull.

2007-02-25 05:23:58 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 17 1

I'm sure you will get many immature answers to this question as conservatives love to bash liberals and liberals love to criticize conservatives. First it should be said that not all Republicans and Democrats support their parties stated plan. Second, though I don't particularly like the man, Sen. Biden has a great plan that is not a simple pull out. He wants to use diplomacy rather than increased military to cut down on sectarian violence. His goal is to in essence create three separate states, one for each major faction. I really see this as an intelligent move and one that could stop the in fighting and get us out with little issues left behind. To tell you the truth the whole fiasco is shameful and I wish it were not our war, but it is. We have to look at bi-partisanship and diplomacy as a way to band together and finish this mission rather than pointing fingers. But don't hold your breath for that.

2007-02-25 11:50:35 · answer #2 · answered by waitingon2angels 2 · 0 0

I think it's shameful how you spend your time online insulting the other side like this.


Just wait. When the democrats DON'T surrender you'll look like a fool.


And if you're going to say Republicans want to win the war on terror.... then you must throw in that even as a liberal so do I. I just think the "Stand tall and firm" approach is getting our soldiers killed. Any tactician says sometimes you don't bust in the front doors and let them come to you.

2007-02-25 11:53:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1 2

Surrender is ALWAYS more shameful. Look at how the French are not respected. Seems like liberals want to make us pariahs like them.

2007-02-25 15:39:09 · answer #4 · answered by sam simeon 3 · 1 0

The Dems' plan to surrender by defunding the war.

2007-02-25 11:52:57 · answer #5 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 2 1

You really don't need to ask do you. I think you know the answer but thanks for the 2 points anyway.

Oh, we can't win the war on terror but we sure can keep them on their toes and kill as many as possible.

2007-02-25 12:18:50 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0 0

Dems who are providing the enemy comfort in knowing that all they have to do is stick to it, keep up the killing and pressure, and sooner or later the dems will win out and we will pull our troops out....they see it as our weakness and they are correct. If they knew that we would never pull out, and that we would use all our military might on them, this war would have been over with long ago....as it stands, they are just biding their time and waiting for our pull out, and in the meantime we are loosing lives in our military.....way to go libs.

2007-02-25 11:41:20 · answer #7 · answered by TNT 3 · 4 1

Democrats cutting and running to allow terrorists to do whatever they want is much more shameful

2007-02-25 11:43:38 · answer #8 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 3 1

Easy answer. Surrendering democants for sure. They are pathetic POS.

2007-02-25 11:40:12 · answer #9 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 3 1

A. There is no plan for surrender.

B. You cannot make war on a word.

2007-02-25 11:39:01 · answer #10 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers