English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

who is better

2007-02-25 03:20:15 · 14 answers · asked by nknk 1 in Sports Basketball

14 answers

I like Chauncy better but overall there the same
DEETTRROOIITT BASKETBALL

2007-02-25 03:23:10 · answer #1 · answered by Mullen 4 · 1 1

They play different positions and roles so it's kind of hard to really compare the two, but if it came down to which one to keep if you could only have one, I'd go with Chauncy.

2007-02-25 11:31:08 · answer #2 · answered by Sephra 5 · 0 0

They're both excellent players but I'll go with Chauncy...

2007-02-27 16:25:35 · answer #3 · answered by Marvin P 3 · 0 0

Chauncy he has more idea of whats going on

2007-02-25 14:23:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Rip. Chauncy is benifitting from being on a good team. How come he sucked *** a couple of years ago. Wuz on a team that suucked ***.

2007-02-25 13:07:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd take Chauncy. Stronger, better three's, better handles, better boards, better passes AND he's a clutch shooter.

2007-02-25 14:21:56 · answer #6 · answered by Big Z 6 · 1 0

Billups is a more complete player. Hamilton is more fundamentally sound. Billups can do everything from clutch shots, dishes, etc. He can even score. Hamilton, on the othsr hand, has been an average player with slightly better numbers. Billups has a Finals MVP trophy to back his accomplishments up.

2007-02-25 13:07:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Rip= cuts to the basket lot of defense dunks and good shots

Chauncy= Clutch plays, motion 3 ptrs

My pick is rip

2007-02-25 11:23:59 · answer #8 · answered by Carlos C Sps 2 · 0 0

Chauncey, all Rip can do is score points. Chauncey passes better, plays better D, and shoots 3's better. Alot of Rip's buckets come from Chauncey's assists.

2007-02-25 11:24:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Good question-I have never really compared the two because they work so well together! In all hoently I dont think one of them is better than the other...I think they are equal players! They each have different qualities a basketball player needs-I think that is why their games compliment each other so well-They complete one another!!

2007-02-25 11:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers