English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Last Week, Hilary Clinton suggested it was more important for a woman to become president than for a black man to do so.

2007-02-25 02:53:11 · 13 answers · asked by will p 1 in Politics & Government Elections

13 answers

Absolutely not! It is more important for the right candidate that is going to do the best for our country & it's people to be elected. It should never be based on race, gender or religion.

2007-02-25 02:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

so it begins, it's a NON-ISSUE. don't be fooled by politic ans. OK here is the way it is going to work. Hillary and Obama argue over who would make the better president a women or a black man for the next two years. all the media focuses on this non issue. instead of putting focus on elections. Giuliani is championed as an American hero and wins another rigged election. something bad happens in america, then Giuliani bombs Iran.

ask yourself, why don't we hear specifics on issues in the media.

All these politicians democrats and republicans are financed by the same people.

all of the presidents have had the same foreign relation chiefs for 30, 40 , and 50 years sometimes. all the same CIA leaders. and definitely all the same fed reserve leaders. all the same banking chiefs of staff.

That means who ever you vote for is bought and paid for by the same people.

Those are the people who control the government, control the media to put non issues out there for the dumb Americans to argue about like it matters AT ALL. IT doesn't matter, and if a politician tells you it matters while avoiding the issues like she has then you know they are lying!

WAKE UP AMERICA! IT"S YOUR COUNTRY TAKE IT BACK!

2007-02-25 04:32:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Do we need another four to eight years of the Clintons. Wasn't the last 8 yr. session of lies, immorality, suspicious deaths, socialism, and arrogance enough. Bill and Hillary are two peas in a pod. Neither would know the truth if it hit them in the face, and telling lies without even trying is a trait they share and encourage in others.

Will we have a woman President? Sure! Maybe soon, but I pray it's not a traitorous Clinton. I can think of several women who would make much better Presidents that this one.

2007-02-25 03:07:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Way back when, during slavery and that crap, woman fought for the rights of African Americans and their ability to vote. They did this in the attempt that when African Amercian men recieved the ability, that women would also. That didn't happen how they thought. Black men got the ability, but women didn't and that really angered them. It may turn out this way, Hilary thinking that if people vote for an African American for president, they will surely vote for a women. An, like it did, she may not get the vote. But when it comes to importance, I don't think it really is that important, but it kind of makes me mad Hilary promoting feminism. I think both sexes are equal, but if she doesn't think, then there is no chance in hell that I will vote for her.

2007-02-25 07:37:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Then she is wrong... it is important, especially now after this dirty white house we have had, for us to elect someone new and fresh and above all honest. someone who actually cares what happens to this country and its people. Not someone trying to make a name in history for themselves.

I think Hillary is smart and might make a good president but i don't know if perhaps she has been in Washington too long.. some of the grime may be sticking to her. Obama and Edwards on the other hand are new and fresh and i think they and the country deserve a chance.

2007-02-25 03:30:25 · answer #5 · answered by Debra H 7 · 0 0

I see neither one as being important. What is important to me is national security and this should be in the minds and on the lips of every potential voter. Frankly, I know of only one female and one black man running for president, and I don't see national security as being high on either of their priority lists.

Maybe your question should be revised to read : Is it more important to have a female president or national security? Or, Is it more important to have a black president or national security?

2007-02-25 04:45:50 · answer #6 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0 0

The most important thing to consider about a candidate in an election is whether or not the individual is qualified. Race or gender do not belong and should not be considered when voting.

2007-02-25 04:09:56 · answer #7 · answered by happygael 6 · 0 0

Paul Robeson is one in each and every of my heroes. He replace right into a lawyer, a singer, an actor and a campaigner. Then there is Nina Simone, Miriam Makeba, Billie trip, Miles Davis, Charlie Parker, count extensive sort Basie, Valaida Snow... all musicians, all extremely influential. producer, composer and musician Quincy Jones is a residing legend. A topical one at present, regrettably, is Toussaint Louverture, the former slave whose revolt brought about Haiti's independence. there are a super sort of. good good fortune on your son.

2016-10-16 11:09:34 · answer #8 · answered by scafuri 4 · 0 0

The best person (as voted for by the people) would be the Winner
not a woman, man, white, black, brown, yellow, red, gay, or Lesbian
Vote the person not the RACE or SEX of the person

2007-02-25 05:17:53 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Black, white, male female: this is not the issue. Who is the person best qualified for the job.

The lady of justice is blind; why can't we use this standard in voting for the highest office in the U.S.

Race or gender is a poor excuse to vote for anyone in this day and age.

2007-02-25 02:59:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers