me. Really can't imagine looking at him for 4 years. Oh my God we need help. Please don't elect Edwards.
2007-02-25 02:50:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
nobody can be weaker than a president who sits in an elementary school classroom reading a book "upside down" with piss running down his leg when he has been told that America is under attack!!!!!!
what exactly makes Edwards weak??? his biceps??? cmon now!!!!! strength is measured in the content of his character!!!!
2007-02-25 02:55:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm not a Bush fan but I think you're a little confused. It was Bush that get the whole home security started and it wasn't Bush's fault that 9-11 happened more so the failings of the president before him to not do anything when he was told about the possibilities of an attack. I have to agree with you about Edwards but you really need to see the truth about Bush and not the BS that the democrats are mud slinging.
2007-02-25 10:56:48 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, we'd be in as much trouble, but it would be a different kind of trouble. For example, we'd pull right out of Iraq, but then we might have terrorism popping up in other places. We might scrap the Patriot Act, but then we might have terrorists planning another 911 right under our noses as they did before. There'd be more immigration and more political correctness and more suppression of Christianity and more affirmative action and more trial lawyers shutting down businesses.
2007-02-25 10:58:43 · answer #3 · answered by kscottmccormick 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Weird. Weakness and Edwards ... yes, most of your question makes sense... but something's not quite right ...
2007-02-25 10:55:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
None of the Presidential frontrunners from wither party look any good. Whoever wins in 2008, we lose. All the good guys are buried to the bottom but they don't get the national attention like Obama, Guliani, Clinton, etc.
2007-02-25 10:54:27 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Pibb 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The pr emus of your question suggests that Bush is weak. On that I must disagree. There for you question is invalid
2007-02-25 11:00:20 · answer #6 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same goes for Clinton, or Obama, or Kucinich, or McCain.
Not that I want to give the Democrats advice, but their best candidate is really Bill Richardson.
2007-02-25 10:54:23 · answer #7 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Let's not mistake kindness for weakness.
Edwards, at least has backbone and doesn't cow tow to the aristocrats, like Bush & Co. does.
.
2007-02-25 10:55:20 · answer #8 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
compared to the other dem candidates, he comes across as at least decent and honorable.
2007-02-25 10:55:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋