Would you like killing and dying when nothing is getting better for anyone as a result?
2007-02-25 00:28:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Im puzzled with the aid of the flaws human beings like your self typ.. i ask your self the place you get your suggestions and how it rather is which you have become so naive... 1000's of 1000's of deaths?? thats some resourceful mathmatics the place did you get your education? Now the Mexico border subject i visit believe you on with out argument. the North American Union subject... are you saying you think that democrats would not try this? properly they have administration of congress now so shall we see shall we.. have faith me its extra in all risk to ensue with a socialist leaning group of human beings than no longer. some day human beings at last discover that the have been misled to a large degree. they think of that they are pursuing the fact and are available to make certain that they've been getting fed extra junk and lies from those human beings than those they thought have been the liers interior the 1st place.
2016-11-25 22:10:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's the point?
I myself am "unhappy" with how the war is progressing. I'm sure that's true for George Bush and most of his administration. As the article says, the mood of the troops typically mirrors that of the country as a whole.
So am I to assume that if you (or whomever your favored presidential candidate might be) were Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces and found yourself involved in a military action, you'd take periodic polls of public opinion to decide on strategy?
Great leadership, eh?
Unfortunately, in the Kumbaya world of liberalism, the overriding motivator is "happiness". Someday, you may find yourself trying to lead in a situation where EVERYONE is unhappy.
What would you do then?
2007-02-25 14:51:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's because they are apparently learning that they are just small pawns in the big oil chess game. They are dying and murdering for oil. King Shrubby should spend the rest of his worthless life in prison for the crimes he's committed. I'm not deluded enough to think that'll happen though. I have a feeling that history will show him to be a gallant crusader to defeat the evil terrorism. It's a sickening thought, but that's how I feel. He's murdered tens, maybe hundreds, of thousands of innocent old people, women, children. The list goes on and on to infinity.
2007-02-25 00:32:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Oh you mean the poll where they wont post the raw poll data, and you have to email some guy and ask him for it.
I find it somewhat amusing that the army isnt who runs army times. Its owned by Mediawest - GCI. They mostly own media in the UK ( about 75% of their businesses are there )
And there is no way for them to even know who of the people they polled are even in the military.
2007-02-25 00:49:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by sociald 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Retired Army, been to Iraq three times. I saw plenty of support for the administration and plenty of disgust towards people such as yourself. Only failure is your poll...
http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2003_chart2.php
2007-02-25 00:38:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
YOU MIGHT WANT TO TAKE A READING COMPREHENSION COURSE
It says they support the War. Do you know what "handle" means? It's time for you Libs to enlist. You don't walk the walk like the Republican soldiers so what makes a Lib think he can quote them?
[P]wned.
2007-02-25 00:29:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No one in Congress threatening to fire them after the 2007 Election?
2007-02-25 00:30:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Taco 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
From your article "A surprising 13 percent said we should have no troops there. "
2007-02-25 00:35:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because they are intelligent and patriotic, unlike bush and his chickenhawk traitor cronies.
2007-02-25 00:30:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋