I'm not so sure that Israel won't do it themselves. The US would prevent anything from happening at the irrelevant UN.
2007-02-23 23:29:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you recall the last time Iran built a nuclear facility the Israelis bombed it before it became operational. And no American lives were lost. You might also recall the Iraq was under supervision and regular fly overs by the US and the UN so they were not a threat to the US at the time we invaded. We seem happy enough to let Israel do our dirty work there, if the Iranis get too close to a bomb, Israel will stand up, yet again, and eliminate the facility and once again Israel will suffer the lies of the people who wish only to inflame anti Jewish sentiment. You play so beautifully into our enemies hands.
2007-02-24 00:19:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by justa 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am from Iran. Iran is a threat to the US and the rest of the world. For 28 year they have been trying to export their Islamic revolution. They hid their nuclear program for 18 years. If their nuclear program is for generation of electricity, why did they need to hide it from the IAEA for 18 years? Why not have a transparent program and allow inspectors to visit their sites?
Isreal sees Iran as a threat; however, the issue has not escalted to the point where Israel would bomb those nuclear sites. The reason Israel doesn't act alone is that it's surrounded by Arabs. It's a nation of 7 million vs 1 billion moslems in the world. But make no mistake. If Iran does reach final stages of nuclear developement, Israel will take them out.
Finally, you seem rather ignorant about world politics. I would suggest you spend less time writing stupid questions here and more time learning about world history, geography, and politics.
2007-02-24 00:35:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bob 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because if Iran does get nuclear weapons, Israel, unlike the USA, is right within their range. Add that to the fact that the president of Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, and it's no wonder the Israelis are worried. Quite reasonably, Israel doesn't want to get nuked, and it certainly doesn't want to be the first target in a massive nuclear war.
I don't think Iran should be attacked, but Israel pushing for it is pretty reasonable.
2007-02-23 23:29:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Iran does have a nuclear application yet at present day that's basically a nuclear potential application. They do have countless the infrastructure to construct nuclear weapons yet lack too many key areas to be seen a severe danger. they're making no attempt to acquire those key areas or cause them to. The CIA and the Israeli Mossad and our very own acceptable Generals such because of the fact the chairman of our Joint Chiefs of paintings tension all agree that Iran isn't presently construction a nuclear weapons application. Iran isn't interfering with UN inspectors and those inspectors have given comprehensive comments on Iran's nuclear potential events. you may seem all of this up. you pays attention to U.S. military Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, our Chairman of the Joint Chiefs testify to congress and make sure what I even have reported. you pays attention to 3 former heads of the Mossad who're nonetheless in contact with the intelligence community additionally agree that Iran isn't a present day danger. in reality, in case you get right down to it, the sole people who're calling Iran a danger are political applicants and the optimal cable information networks. everybody else is denying that's loudly as they are in a position to and being surpassed over. I even have even seen a checklist from the CIA presented in PDF which you would be able to study for your self which specific what they even have and could make and how they lack the supplies to make nuclear weapons yet this checklist became into linked to a narrative asserting they have been making nuclear weapons. i assume the reporter did no longer relatively study the checklist he linked or he got here upon it no longer likely that everybody else could. which suits to get greater information rankings. a narrative that announces Iran isn't relatively a danger and we are able to flow back to observing soccer or a narrative that announces they are going to kill us interior the subsequent 5 minutes if we don't nuke them first? Which gets greater votes. A candidate who says he's no longer nervous approximately Iran or individual who says he will annihilate them to keep us from impending dying? believe what you choose i assume yet counsel is obtainable in case you weed interior the path of the BS. international war 3 is far less of a danger to us than our deficit is. however the deficit is lots greater durable to restoration than bombing Iran.
2016-10-01 21:56:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel wants us to deal with Iran so the do not have to Also so they won't look like the aggressors that they are
2007-02-23 23:45:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by bisquedog 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
You liberals call Bush Hitler.. but yet it's liberals i always see spouting off anti semitic remarks.
Why doesn't Israel deserve to exist? Iran has stated over and over they'd love to wipe Israel off the face of the earth..and nuclear weapons would give them that ability.
2007-02-23 23:39:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by . 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because Bush is the best thing to ever happen to Israel, it is important to exploit the remainder of his term. Now let's see... what else should Israel ask from Bush's America?
2007-02-23 23:37:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Well folks, another rednecked pencil duck, showing off his bad upbringing and lack of education...
2007-02-24 00:32:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
why you blame israel anyway?
they can do it them self if they want to.
-----
2007-02-23 23:29:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
1⤋