English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't believe Money was instrumental in making Taj Mahal, Rather Vision was.

2007-02-23 22:27:22 · 13 answers · asked by A VERY ORDINARY MAN 1 in Arts & Humanities History

13 answers

As time changes, the fundamentals of architecture changes. We don't find structures like Taj Mahal or Pyramids any more, but we do find huge buildings built with amazing architectural sense. We do find the Empire State building, the Twin Towers, The Lotus Temple, The Parliament Building, etc...

:-)

2007-02-24 06:10:28 · answer #1 · answered by plato's ghost 5 · 0 0

The Taj Mahal was built to be a monument of love by Shah Jahan. The worker's hands were cut off so that they couldn't replicate it - maybe that's why there aren't such great structures around.

2007-02-23 22:40:05 · answer #2 · answered by Beyond 2 · 0 0

I suppose there were other structures like Taj Mahal but they are all gone because lots of time has passed.
It is not reasonable to build such buildings now. They are not practical just beautiful and nobody wants pure beauty nowadays

2007-02-23 23:00:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Come on, money had a very big hand in creating Taj Mahal. Can u afford even haft the amount of marble used?

2007-02-23 22:36:26 · answer #4 · answered by anshika 3 · 0 0

India itself has many exemplary pieces of architecture more impressive than the Taj Mahal. The new Akshar Dham temple in Delhi is one such example.

2007-02-24 03:04:25 · answer #5 · answered by Smart Indian 4 · 0 0

Come on what kind of guy will spend so much money these days to build something like that, he would rather get another wife to replace her, cheaper and newer.

But more to the point, there is no such love in the world any more, more materialistic now and also terrible builders, more sand then cement in a building so why take the risk of it falling down in a few months.

2007-02-23 22:44:38 · answer #6 · answered by ashok kumar 3 · 0 0

we are no longer observing the history, it fairly is the form. To me, the Taj Mahal is a real attractiveness, forget approximately relating to the reality that each and all of the classic kings those days have been nutters. once you're reminded of what occurred on your human beings, enjoy their hard artwork and sacrifice. human beings those days have been very dependable, to the two their king and united states, do no longer insult their sacrifice. So what if Shah Jahan replaced right into a Muslim? it fairly isn't any reason to be prejudiced against others. in case you incredibly desire to enjoy this ask your self, enjoy it fairly is attractiveness incredibly of lamenting it fairly is faults. it fairly is the final you're able to do. Cheers!!!!!!!!

2016-10-16 09:21:01 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If we find many more Taj Mahal then it is a building.

2007-02-23 22:45:23 · answer #8 · answered by indra k 2 · 0 0

Why talk of Taj. Walk the Indian rural roads now. Indian Freedom fighters walked and marched more frequently through them, to peep into that midnight.

After 58 years of freedom, we have now started improving our infrastructure and airports. History was green and not of other colours.

2007-02-24 03:18:04 · answer #9 · answered by marsh man 3 · 0 0

Donald wanted to build a tower instead

2007-02-23 22:34:03 · answer #10 · answered by winkcat 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers