2007-02-23 21:43:14 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Check out the date on this article: Updated: March 7, 2006
WASHINGTON - "Vice President **** Cheney warned of dire consequences if Iran continued its nuclear fuel enrichment". That was a year ago and Washington did nothing. Now that Bush and company are losing the support of the Iraqi war, all the sudden Iran is a major problem.
2007-02-23 23:11:10 · answer #1 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So what? The wimpy democrats does not have the stomach to spread freedom and democracy into Third World nations. The voters are buying it too and voted in liberals to the congress. This is the last opportunity for Cheney and team to unleash the full force of American freedom on the world while he still controls US spending. If liberal demoRATS win the election next time and vote our Commander-in-Chief out there wont be a second chance to bomb the mullahs of Iran that are blackmailing the world by holding hostage the energy reserves of the world.
2007-02-27 04:26:40 · answer #2 · answered by Kaliyug Ka Plato 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Check this out...I thought it was the role of the President to make foreign ploicy...not some wimpy Vice President hmmm.... I am confused ....who is the President really?????
As I recall nobody elected Cheney as President, maybe we ought to impeach his butt for overstepping his authority, since George W. doesn't seem to care, we wold probably be doing George W. a big favor. I think he realizes what a despicable monster he has created and has allowed to feed on the blood of many Americans. Time for a wake-up call. Now that the democrats have the helm, I dare them to do what is right and get that traitor(Cheney) out of office.
2007-02-27 23:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you get into too much trouble create a distraction, increase the complexity of the situation to the point that the magnitude of the situation overshadows or even justifies the overall conspiracy.
They are considering protracting the war on into Iran, make no mistake about it, and considering the record of their policy so far they just may go for setting the Globe on fire rather than accepting responsibility for their actions and face the consequences. .
2007-02-24 13:23:40 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This Person is the 2nd most dangerous person in the U.S. ...George W.. Being #1...Neither one Playing with a Full Deck!!!!!!!
2007-02-24 06:11:36 · answer #5 · answered by bodie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
cheney is a very dangerous man.
2007-02-24 21:35:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hang on, kids, it's going to be a bumpy ride!
2007-02-24 09:01:12 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is one option peace?
your headline implies knowledge
a source?
2007-02-24 05:46:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i do not thing peace is on the table.
2007-02-24 05:50:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Give us a source..................
2007-02-24 19:12:31 · answer #10 · answered by ILSE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋