Factually, people who earn over $150,000 per year pay 96 PERCENT of all income taxes in the US every year. If you think the paltry sum you pay in taxes every year is significant as a lower or middle class individual, think again. Middle class citizens pay about 30% on average of their income, and they get a good portion of that money back, but upper class citizens pay nearly 50% of their income, AND they get no tax return. People who think the middle and lower class are overly burdened by taxes have been believing the lies Democrats tell them without researching, plain and simple.
The worst thing you could do is vote Democrat.
They will only tax you more than you are taxed already.
So-called tax cuts for the middle class that they promise are empty rhetoric that never happens, time after time.
For the poster who mentioned the flat tax: I am all for it!
So many Liberals would whine and cry over that though, because they would not get a huge tax refund for once, and it would confuse the hell out of them.
2007-02-23 20:04:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by drbuns 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I most certainly hope so, God knows the rich vampire neo-cons deserve it. The have been slopping at the public tax trough for so long they act like they own the poor. We do not despise the wealthy, we despise the ridiculously slanted corporate oriented government our Country has been saddled with and the grossly unequal distribution of wealth in the U.S. A flat rate income tax across the board would balance the budget in a year if the upper 5% paid proportionally the same as the lower 95%.
Government officials must govern the people who elected them, and the United States hasn't been doing that for about 20 years. It is time to detach the parasitic corporate vampire from the public throat and save the middle class by saving our industrial base. The EU all but owns our industrial base as it is, and we must save what is left. Doing so will also save the middle class, an aspect of the United States I personally feel is worthy of saving.
It is easy for the Federal Government to stop the outsourcing of America, they must protect our economy with the use of tariffs. All other countries do it, and so must we if we have a hope of providing for our population and remaining a world power. It is not socialism to be socially responsible. There is no excuse for the homeless problem in the United States and 40 million uninsured medically is an disgrace shared by anyone who calls themselves American.
2007-02-23 20:05:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by blogbaba 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
aren't democrats also wealthy these days? the people on the hill who are democrats are all wealthy. they would be the ones raising taxes but then again they might be exempt cuz they are in d.c. besides the majority of all the dem law makers come into office rich. don't believe me? you can look them up and see what they do or did before getting elected. rich i tell ya.
the tax breaks affect so few of us even if our incomes are in the $200,000/yr range so i don't know if that's even something that was done for "us." if they raise taxes, it will probably be for things like improving schools, giving more loans to college students, building affordable homes in rural areas, extending healthcare for kids under the First 5 program, creating programs to combat the rise in obesity in school age children. yeah, i see your point, the successful people would be really mad.
2007-02-23 19:53:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by usf law 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Heres my grotesque address this concern: maximum helps of the present equipment ascribe additionally to the myth of upward mobility. in this united states its portion of the widely prevalent mythology which you will possibly be in spite of you desire to be. human beings tell their youngsters you need to be president nonetheless there is not any actual supportive evidence for this traditionally. a million adverse president something wealthy human beings. the myth that each and everyone you desire is game and additionally you will possibly be in the NBA. actual adequate it does take place yet realistically you will possibly besides get in the lottery. Its a farce and as quickly because it sinks into the minds of the widely used american they are going to start to virtually resent it. suitable now they flow to the flicks and notice Happyieness or some such propaganda some guy with in simple terms the desire to be triumphant. they might desire to tell the thousands of comments the place a similar will meets defeat.
2016-10-16 09:16:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Punish What? Who do you think generated their wealth? What part of a CEO's salary being 400 times the entry level employee these days do you not understand?
Why don't you go ask the Bill Gates of the world How Much Money is Enough for you and see what they say?
Trying to justify anothers greed---baaaahaaaaa! Go back to the flock!!
2007-02-23 19:49:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by scottyurb 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
yes they always raise taxes .Clinton 1993 largest tax increase in history
2007-02-23 19:56:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by standingbare3 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
if it wasn't for the poor working for the wealthy they wouldn't have any money you wouldn't expect the wealthy to actually work would you. but the simplest solution is to have a flat tax. no special discounts to anybody.
2007-02-23 19:55:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by jwk227 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is an easy way to fix this unbalanced problem-----A flat tax!
No loopholes ---no tax breaks----10% across the board!
2007-02-23 19:45:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
People who inherit wealth are not successful, just lucky. And usually self-centered, self-righteous and obscenely spoiled. Tax the crap out of them.
2007-02-23 19:48:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mike J 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I hope so it is about time the haves shared with the have nots. Let health care be funded by those who break the backs of their workers.
2007-02-23 19:55:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cherry_Blossom 5
·
1⤊
3⤋