he was a contender. How can they disrespect the man? He should be in the top five at least.
2007-02-23 19:24:00 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Man in a Box is right. Bush'll take the crown once he's out of office. Should he not be able to fulfill his duties as worst, first runner up will step in. Only problem is....... they are all dead. *shrugs* But then again........ how is that any different than when they were in office?
2007-02-23 23:05:11 · answer #1 · answered by Marianne not Ginger™ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The media will tip-toe around that one until he leaves office...then they will lambaste him.
I read an article about a survey that some think-tank group was conducting in which they interviewed a bunch of historians who were having some annual conference at a major university. They asked them to name the worst president in history. Most of them declined. Then the historians were asked if they would answer if they could remain anonymous. At that point, most of them agreed to answer. And who did they pick as worst president? Buchanan got the most votes. A very close second was Bush Jr. Ha ha.
2007-02-23 19:33:03 · answer #2 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
With the modern era of media and internet, the government cannot hide the things they do as easily as they did in the early ages of our countrys birth. I feel we will never have another Kennedy or Reagan. Bush and Clinton will be right up there in a long line of presidents with low ratings....
2007-02-24 04:34:01 · answer #3 · answered by Ben R 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He sealed his destiny with this very last gasp for his area, the $seven-hundred bailout. The stupid "monetary stimulus plan" became for about $one hundred and 55 billion an a finished waste. i think sorry for him in a unusual way. He became in simple terms letting the large boys pull his strings. He has been a puppet from the time they created him and made him Gov. ot Texas. it really is how they do it. human beings ought to tutor their absolute loyalty and willingness to obey earlier both party will artwork in earnest to get them go with. Obama is owned and McCain became promised. we are suckers to enable both events do this to any extent further.
2016-12-04 21:18:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the long run Bush will go down in History as the "Worst President in History"
2007-02-23 19:41:31 · answer #5 · answered by bodie 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I'm so sick of people like you! If you think you could have handled, the events that have happend to our country in recent years better, then you should run for president.
2007-02-23 20:53:40 · answer #6 · answered by Motopunk 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The worst in my book would be FDR. His cabinet was full of communists and he knew it. His economic policies made the depression worse and last longer.
Bush has kept things on an even keel with the greatest proportion of homeowners ever, super low unemployment when huge forces in the world are trying to destroy our economy.
2007-02-23 19:35:09 · answer #7 · answered by Susan M 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You neglected to mention who was the worst. I assume It wasJFK or LBJ, right?
2007-02-24 00:44:15 · answer #8 · answered by webbrew 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
USnews and world report does not know what it is talking about.
2007-02-24 13:35:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, he still has a couple years left...
2007-02-23 22:18:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋