Roe vs. Wade is the easy answer for the right. Give me your next.
2007-02-23 16:57:06 · 14 answers · asked by apple juice 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Easy: The Commerce Clause. It's been the foundation of every federal excess for the past hundred and eighty years and is THE most egregious example of federal courts and lawmakers perverting the intent of the Constitution solely for the purpose of giving themselves more power than the Founding Fathers ever intended.
2007-02-23 17:27:56 · answer #1 · answered by Jeff C 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First of all, Roe vs. Wade and Kelo vs. Greenwich, CT are NOT federal laws, they are Supreme Court interpretations of federal law and the United States Constitution.
I think I would repeal the Federal income tax and move to a Federal Sales tax instead. It would make a whole lot more sense for you to pay tax based on the prices of the products you buy versus how much money you can hide from the IRS.
2007-02-23 18:11:05 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO wellness care as a bill is constitutional. Glenn Beck would not actually have a college degree. has below no circumstances taken a direction in constitutional regulation or political technologies. He has no authority to spew out such subject concerns. This bill AND Roe V. Wade are the two constitutional. I basically say, get used to them. they at the instant are no longer going away. even nonetheless the white majority throughout this u . s . a . is.
2016-11-25 20:20:46 · answer #3 · answered by mcraney 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The federal income tax is probably another easy answer. Maybe I'd like to reform it, not end it.
I would overturn the Kelo decision - allowing municipalities to take property and hand it over to private developers - in a heartbeat.
Congress could pass a law doing it - why haven't they?
2007-02-23 17:42:32 · answer #4 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I kind of hate the double jeopardy law. I mean to an extent one shouldn't be tried for the same crime, but if new evidence comes in, they just go free? I forget what Roe v. Wade was about.
2007-02-23 17:02:51 · answer #5 · answered by Donovan G 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The recent approval by the Supreme Court that allows peoples homes to be seized under eminent domain to turn over to a "developer" to increase the local tax base.
2007-02-23 17:32:48 · answer #6 · answered by jonn449 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would get rid of the Second Amendment. No one should have a "right" to bear arms anywhere except for hunters with a whole lot of licenses.
Everyone being able to walk around with a gun would not decrease crime. People are so stupid they would shoot each other in sudden rages over petty things. And in Europe, where gun deaths are essentially nonexistent, guns are _banned_.
2007-02-23 17:21:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would replace the concealed weapons law.. I don't think it would be a bad idea to carry your weapons freely. I tell you one thing, the crime rate would drop significantly!
2007-02-23 17:00:12 · answer #8 · answered by BigWashSr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The law that makes Illegal Aliens babies U.S. citizens
2007-02-23 16:59:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i would make the drinking age 18 again
2007-02-23 17:04:41 · answer #10 · answered by tj 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋