Blairs going,americAs econmys going down hill fast ,with no short term sign of recovery.
2007-02-23 15:48:54 · 11 answers · asked by yaboo 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You're asking that question....NOW? Bush hasn't had an ounce of credibility for about 4 years now. And he's dragged Blair down with him.
2007-02-23 15:52:02 · answer #1 · answered by truth be told 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Actually Bush and Blair are the only poliitcians who still have credability. America's economy is under attack not from radical Islamic fundanmentalists, but form European conglomerates buying the industrial base of American through a long series of corporate mergers and outright takeovers. Most politicians are already owned by their campaign contributors.
With the industrial capacity of the United States in the hands of foriegn owners, the American government cannot support it's own people, or even equip it's military. They win without firing a shot, just like the Euro took Europe were Hitler failed with bullets.
I can only hope the U.S. wakes up before it is too late, it may already be too late, but I agree the major threat to both Blair and Bush is the ecnomic one posed by the EU, not terrorism.
2007-02-23 16:01:34 · answer #2 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Blair's leaving leads me to believe that something is brewing..... I think Blair caught wind of Bush's eminent plans to attack Iran SOON. When that happens the Iranian forces will be over the Iraq border in a flash. American forces who are worn out after 4 years of battle will be faced with a fresh professional army of men who just saw their county blown up under a mushroom cloud. If the Iranian army can't bring the American Army to its knees, the Russians (who have had just about enough of Bush's ****), will come in and finish the job. Israel will send over its troops, but as we all saw in Lebanon this summer, Israel wont do sh!t.
Despite having his head up Bush's *** for the past 4 years, Blair seems to be able to see the handwriting on the wall...... Bush is out for blood, and it doesn't matter whose
..................
2007-02-23 16:02:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Surely the credibility question should be asked of the people who voted for them. In the UK people voted for the economy. I think to the eternal shame of those voters,the war in Iraq was a long way down the list.
2007-02-27 15:43:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone notice that when Prince Harry got ready to join the troops, England pulled out??
2007-02-23 15:53:48 · answer #5 · answered by nanlwart 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No credibility lies with the dems. Bush told them before the vote for war it would be for a long time.
They voted yes. Now say no
2007-02-23 15:55:29 · answer #6 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
A big yes
2007-02-25 00:25:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on who you ask. They have no credibility with the people they are supposed to serve and major credibility with the ones they actually serve.
2007-02-23 15:54:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. Bush was voted in for a second term.
2007-02-23 15:51:06 · answer #9 · answered by jasonpickles 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
They never had it to loose
2007-02-23 16:23:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋