what started the big bang?

Question

what do scientists believe started the big bang?

Answer 1

that right there is the question that makes scientists stop believing in the big bang. an event needs a cause. matter cannot just invent its own cause and appear out of nowhere. and it takes way too much faith to believe in something like that.

i think scientists that believe in the big bang, what they think started it, is that the mathematical probability of life happening, the odds dont matter against whatever billions of trillions of years had passed. like winning the right lottery ticket. impossible but lets say you live for billions of years the odds dont matter because after a couple million years the mathematical probability will eventually be in your favor. and you will win.

something like that.
=D

Answer 2

Before the big bang nothing existed,except a finite potential.
The potential had to be finite or it could not have emerged.
After time zero a space-time pulse was initiated,a single two dimensional entity.
The pulse continued every 10 to the minus 95 of a second.
The third pulse gave us a single space-time unit of four dimensions.
Each pulse tripled the space unit causing it to expand.
The acceleration of the expansion was restricted by the time pulse.
In 1-30 billionths of a second the ball grew to the size of a marble,the radial velocity was the speed of light so the acceleration stopped.
The result was a mature primordial universe expanding at "C"
There was no electo-magnetism,no gravity and no strong or weak forces.
The ball was not perfect,it contained quantizing errors that would eventually lead to the universe we experience to-day and us.

Answer 3

In physical cosmology, the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the universe emerged from a tremendously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago. The theory is based on the observations indicating the expansion of space in accord with the Robertson-Walker model of general relativity, as indicated by the Hubble redshift of distant galaxies taken together with the cosmological principle.

Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the universe has expanded from a state in which all the matter and energy in the universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts a gravitational singularity.

The term Big Bang is used both in a narrow sense to refer to a point in time when the observed expansion of the universe (Hubble's law) began — calculated to be 13.7 billion (1.37 × 1010) years ago (± 2%) — and in a more general sense to refer to the prevailing cosmological paradigm explaining the origin and expansion of the universe, as well as the composition of primordial matter through nucleosynthesis as predicted by the Alpher-Bethe-Gamow theory.[1]

From this model, George Gamow was able to predict in 1948 the existence of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB).[2] The CMB was discovered in 1964[3] and corroborated the Big Bang theory, giving it more credence over its chief rival, the steady state theory.[4]

Answer 4

Different scientists will tell you different things, but nobody knows for sure. It is impossible to figured out what created the universe without going outside of it, which we can't do. It would be like if we created a virtual world in a computer: the residents of that world would have no way of knowing that they were a simulation.

Answer 5

Yeah... GODDIDIT... it is so glaring, innit? Sheesh... “in case you have "substantial" data helping your god, lay it out - yet observe that the way you experience once you seem at doggies or sunsets, or conversations you had with your self, or your lack of ability to describe something any opposite direction do no longer signify data.” “understand that: objectives are actually not data. Wishful thinking isn't data. Logical fallacies are actually not data. own revelation isn't data. Illogical conclusions are actually not data. Disproved statements are actually not data. Unsubstantiated claims are actually not data. Hallucinations/delusions are actually not data. counsel this is ambiguous isn't data. The Universe would not care what you believe in. archives that calls for a undeniable concept isn't data. counsel that may not be in a position to be time-honored isn't data. counsel that may not be in a position to be falsified isn't data. Experiments with inconclusive effects are actually not data. counsel this is basically knowable via a privileged few isn't data. Experiments that are actually not and can't be duplicated via others are actually not data. the remarkable thing approximately technology is that it would not ask on your faith, basically your eyes.” ~

Answer 6

I don't believe in the big bang theory.But to answer your question they don't know what started it,but I heard someone say maybe everything was just spinning around really super fast until it ignited and exploded.But I don't believe that either.If you really want to know how the universe was created read Genisis in the Holy Bible.

Answer 7

Evolution.

As the universe evolved, it reached the point of the big bang.

Answer 8

the super condensed ball of matter was the result of a gargantuan gravitational field that pulled everything in and it got so tight and compact that eventually the gargantuan gravitational field was no longer Strong enough to hold it and boom

Answer 9

the universe pulsates, once it spreads out it will suck back in. Some people imagine time to reverse during this sucking in. Then once all cramed into a little ball, it explodes again and the universe spreads itself out all over again.

Answer 10

A strong thrust XD