Do feminists believe in the whole "save the women and children first" thing?

Answer 1

I think wot you're asking is if it's possible to believe in equal treatment for women and chivalry at the same time. I think the answer is yes.

It is possible for women to have equal rights under the law and fair treatment in the workplace and still be treated with kindness and respect by men.

Allowing a woman to take a sought-after seat in a lifeboat or a vacant seat on a bus isn't a matter of law or discrimination. It's simply a gesture of courtesy, or in extreme examples, perhaps recognition of gender roles in society or family.

Women are the weaker sex. That is an undeniable truth. Women are more emotional than men and natural nurturers. These are facts that do not preclude that women aren't entitled to equal treatment. Trying to pretend that these are not true does nothing to promote women's rights; it's simply delusional.

Answer 2

Children should be made a priority in any life-or-death situation; after children are safe, we should take care of those who cannot take care of themselves. I see no reason why a healthy woman would be less able to survive than a healthy man would. So...THIS feminist doesn't believe that women should be saved before men.

Answer 3

Ya comprehend, with the break of day of the 21st century, earn money from residing house jobs can and could be on the upward push for both sexes. and that i trust "stay at residing house" discern turns right into a lot less of a stigma for both genders. you even ought to appreciate that there are quite some sorts of feminism and many level of feminist move, and that all of them have particularly diverse ideologies detailing how women human beings must be. For those moms and dads which have the posh of choosing to stay at residing house with their toddlers, absolutely no one ought to criticize or look down on them for it because a discern's presence will be constructive. jointly, like I said, interior the subsequent 10 years i imagine this turns right into a lot less of an subject as stay at residing house or "shorter hours on the workplace" turns into extra commonly used. for instance, a reliable criminal specialist can undertake 9-2 workplace hours and habit some thing of his/her employer from residing house given the right position. i imagine we are going to see extra of this interior the destiny.

Answer 4

I'd say I'm a feminists. In a titanic situation, I don't think I would use gender to establish priority.

Answer 5

Most feminists I have ever known have been of the "Radical" kind, which is the majority of the ones that still exist or have the power within their movement, are the kind that would abort the child so they would only have to worry about themselves and then blame the patriarcal society for it.

Answer 6

Feminists believe that women should have equal opportunities in business, education, and LIFE, and should get paid equally to men for the same jobs.

Answer 7

I beleive in saving the children and other less-abled persons first.

Answer 8

If I am one of the women on the sinking ship then YES - cause in the end I want to live and will exploit any advantage I can get in a life or death situation!

Answer 9

i doubt it.... but im not a feminist... just an equalist... i think it should be children first... but adults can just all go at once...

Answer 10

I hate feminists....Its all ***** ***** *****, moan moan moan. I just like telling them the 70's are over dear so u can stop complaing about being under paid and people trying undermine your reproductive rights/