English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-23 13:17:05 · 10 answers · asked by ~*hottgyal*~ 1 in Education & Reference Homework Help

10 answers

In the grand scheme of things, it was a political instrument that focused the meaning of the war. Whether you believe the war was about states' rights or slavery or anything else, the Emancipation Proclamation turned the political focus of the war onto slavery. According to the wording of the speech, it feed slaves in southern territory only. This was an attempt by Lincoln to get the Seante, House, etc., all on his page and focused on the war in the way he wanted them to be. It never promised to free slaves in northern held territories, Kentucky, Missouri, Delaware, etc., for Lincoln would lose their support.

2007-02-23 13:39:46 · answer #1 · answered by IamCount 4 · 1 0

sure, it really is particularly thrilling that The Emancipation Proclamation definitely did not loose a unmarried slave (regardless of if it did make their freedom inevitable interior the case of a Union victory). because the in effortless words slaves "freed" by the EP were those in states now in secession, and the states in secession were below accomplice administration, it affected no one - at that second. As some different person said it became symbolic --- notwithstanding it became also a promise and an announcement that once those states come decrease back, they're going to come decrease back without slavery. earlier to that there became no longer some thing to tutor that states couldn't go back to the Union precisely as they left, with slavery intact. The EP replaced that. It became, because of the way it made the statement, yet did no longer some thing to offend the border states which nevertheless had slavery yet stay unswerving, and the way it fostered overseas help besides as community help, a genius of wartime maneuvering. For all his weaknesses as a pacesetter, Lincoln turned right into a genius in a great number of recommendations.

2016-12-04 21:01:09 · answer #2 · answered by barnas 4 · 0 0

It showed that slavery WAS a central issue in the Civil War (something Lincoln had denied previously). It "freed" the slaves in the Confederate State of America. However, Lincoln was not in control of these states, so it did not do anything. However, it set the stage for the anti-slavery ammendment that would take place after the war, when the states were reunited.

2007-02-23 14:07:07 · answer #3 · answered by Mommy2006 2 · 1 0

The Emancipation Proclamation freed all of American's slaves and made it illegal to have slaves.

2007-02-23 13:21:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Nothing immediately, as the slaves it supposedly emancipated were currently under the jurisdiction of the states rebelling against the authority of the President who issued it. It only had meaning once the Civil War was over AND won by the Union states.

2007-02-23 13:22:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It made it illegal to hold and keep another human being as a slave. It essentially freed all of the slaves (not living in the south USA).

2007-02-25 06:29:25 · answer #6 · answered by Kerry 7 · 0 0

IT DID NOT FREE THE SLAVES. All it was, was a speach. It helped produce a constitutional amendment that freed the slaves.

2007-02-23 13:27:48 · answer #7 · answered by n0tsan3 3 · 1 0

It freed the slaves. It essentially made slavery illegal in Amercia.

2007-02-23 13:22:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

freed the slaves

2007-02-23 13:42:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

freedom for ALL slaves

2007-02-23 13:24:06 · answer #10 · answered by Earth to Mars 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers