If scientist ever actually create a method of male pregnancy, would this be a violation of nature, or a convenience for women?
2007-02-23 11:18:02 · 43 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Well even if they could I would never make my man go through that kind of pain because he would kill himself lol. Men can't handle a little cold, they could not handle childbirth. That's more pain than I would wish on someone I hate, I wouldn't submit someone I love to it.
2007-02-23 11:25:46 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh my gosh, could you imagine if that way was by having sex, with women, and they got pregnant instead of us, could you imagine how many kids there would be, men are worse than women, they will sleep with anything willing almost. That's probably why it isn't in the cards for them. But let's say they could scientifically, whew? It would be nice for the women that couldn't conceive, that way they could still have children together. But, Pain wise, ha,ha,ha. And I think nature already designed it the way it is for a reason, so it would be a injustice to the nature of things. Kind of goes back to the question, if women could have kids with out men, and we can't, well technically we can't with out a donation.
2007-02-23 11:26:55 · answer #2 · answered by K_Seeks4Answers 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It incredibly does no longer substitute it that a lot. you will possibly be able to additionally see a reasonable roll reversal wherein the guy is extra in all hazard to stay domicile with the youngsters. yet we are already through fact rising. adult men could be much less sexually jealous. Jealousy arises, in the evolutionary attitude, through uncertainty of no count if or no longer this is his genes being handed on. If adult men ought to bare toddlers, there could be no uncertainty, and much less jealousy.
2016-10-16 08:43:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would love it not so much for the convenience but for the lack of understanding. If they knew what it felt like and understood they would pamper the hell out of us! I am pampered a little but it gets kind of old to continue saying I am moody because I am pregnant and I cant control it.
2007-02-23 11:21:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
convenience for a woman, we can get a break, but the men could not handle the pain that we go through. but then we would miss the feeling of being pregnant and carrying are love ones.
2007-02-23 11:34:14 · answer #5 · answered by misty blue 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A definite violation of nature -- then men would truly rule the world
2007-02-23 11:26:46 · answer #6 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How does anyone, woman or man, "bare" children? What are the children then, barren? Which scientist are you thinking of (since you mentioned only one)? And what is the "method of female pregnancy?" I mean, we should know that in order to create its counterpart.
My question: Do you think that people asking questions here should be literate in English?
2007-02-23 11:22:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
It would be both!!!Still why do women have to go through child birth and men dont?Men are
lucky.I know they dont not give birth caz of da pain caz they act like animals.If they cant handle the pain of child birth what makes them think we can?
2007-02-23 13:46:09 · answer #8 · answered by owen 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That would rise a big problem with the religous groups, no?
I think they should, women have it hard enough let the men experience "the beautiful/miracle of giving life"
2007-02-23 11:22:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
violation of nature, Just thinking about it gives me the willies No offense Ladies.
2007-02-23 11:22:06 · answer #10 · answered by MikeDot3s 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋